NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Persistent Genomic Erosion in Whooping Cranes Despite Demographic Recovery

Claudia Fontsere; Samuel A. Speak; Andrew J. Caven; Juan Antonio Rodríguez; Xuejing Wang; Carolina Pacheco; Molly Cassatt‐Johnstone; Georgette Femerling; Brigid Maloney; Jennifer Balacco; Joanna Collins; Ying Sims; Linelle Abueg; Olivier Fedrigo; Erich D. Jarvis; Barry K. Hartup; Beth Shapiro; M. Thomas P. Gilbert; Cock van Oosterhout; Hernán E. Morales
Molecular Ecology · Vol. 34, Issue 23 · 2025

Abstract

Integrating in‐situ (wild) and ex‐situ (captive) conservation efforts can mitigate genetic diversity loss and help prevent extinction of endangered wild populations. The whooping crane ( Grus americana ) experienced severe population declines in the 18th century, culminating in a collapse to ~20 individuals by 1944. Legal protections and conservation actions have since increased the census population from a stock of 16 individuals to approximately 840 individuals, yet the impact on genomic diversity remains unclear. We analysed the temporal dynamics of genomic erosion by sequencing a high‐quality reference genome, and re‐sequencing 16 historical (years 1867–1893) and 37 modern (2007–2020) genomes, including wild individuals and four generations of captive‐bred individuals. Genomic demographic reconstructions reveal a steady decline, accelerating over the past 300 years with the European settlement of North America. Temporal genomic analyses show that despite demographic recovery, the species has lost 70% of its historical genetic diversity and has increased its inbreeding. Although the modern population bottleneck reduced the ancestral genetic load, modern populations possess more realised load than masked load, possibly resulting in a chronic loss of fitness. Integrating pedigree and genomic data, we underscore the role of breeding management in reducing recent inbreeding. Yet ongoing heterozygosity loss, load accumulation, and persistent effects of historical inbreeding (i.e., background inbreeding) argue against the species' downlisting from its current Endangered status on the IUCN Red List and the Endangered Species Act. The presence of private genetic variation in wild and captive populations suggests that wild‐captive crosses could enhance genetic diversity and reduce the realised load. Our findings emphasise the role of genomics in informing conservation management and policy.

Bibliographic Information

JournalMolecular Ecology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2025-12-01
Publication Year2025
Volume34
Issue23
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0962-1083
eISSN1365-294X
DOI10.1111/mec.70088
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/1365294X
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.