NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

The collective application of shorebird tracking data to conservation

Autumn‐Lynn Harrison; Candace Stenzel; Alexandra Anderson; Jessica Howell; Richard B. Lanctot; Marley Aikens; Joaquín Aldabe; Liam A. Berigan; Joël Bêty; Erik Blomberg; Juliana Bosi de Almeida; Andy J. Boyce; David W. Bradley; Stephen Brown; Jay Carlisle; Edward Cheskey; Katherine Christie; Sylvain Christin; Rob Clay; Ashley Dayer; Jill L. Deppe; Willow English; Scott A. Flemming; Olivier Gilg; Christine Gilroy; Susan Heath; Jason M. Hill; J. Mark Hipfner; James A. Johnson; Luanne Johnson; Bart Kempenaers; Paul Knaga; Eunbi Kwon; Benjamin J. Lagassé; Jean‐François Lamarre; Christopher Latty; Don‐Jean Léandri‐Breton; Nicolas Lecomte; Pam Loring; Laura A. McDuffie; Rebecca McGuire; Scott Moorhead; Juan G. Navedo; David Newstead; Erica Nol; Alina Olalla‐Kerstupp; Bridget Olson; Elizabeth Olson; Julie Paquet; Allison K. Pierce; Jennie Rausch; Kevin Regan; Matthew E. Reiter; Amber M. Roth; Mike Russell; Daniel Ruthrauff; Sarah T. Saalfeld; Amy L. Scarpignato; Shiloh Schulte; Nathan R. Senner; Joseph A. M. Smith; Paul A. Smith; Zach Spector; Kelly Srigley Werner; Michelle L. Stantial; Audrey R. Taylor; T. Lee Tibbitts; Mihai Valcu; Nils Warnock; Walter Wehtje; Brad Winn; Michael B. Wunder
Conservation Biology · 2026

Abstract

Addressing urgent conservation issues, such as the drastic declines of North American migratory birds, requires creative, evidence‐based, efficient, and collaborative approaches. The abundance of over 50% of monitored North American shorebird populations has declined by over 50% since 1980. To address these declines, we developed a partnership of scientists and practitioners called the Shorebird Science and Conservation Collective (hereafter the collective ). The collective was founded to translate the combined findings of shorebird tracking data into on‐the‐ground conservation action. With advice from an advisory group, the collective acts as an intermediary whereby dedicated staff collate and analyze data contributions from scientists to support knowledge requests from conservation practitioners. In its first three years, data contributions from 75 organizations include over 7.1 million shorebird observations forming movement paths of 3420 individuals representing 36 species tracked across the Americas and have informed 18 conservation projects spanning education, land and species management, land conservation, and policy requests. Others engaged in translational science from big data could consider similar knowledge‐sharing models that prioritize usable data products, foster collaborative engagement between science experts and practitioners, build focused communities around topics or taxonomic groups, and employ a proof‐of‐concept phase to develop scalable solutions while making progress toward long‐term funding to sustain impact. As the volume of scientific data continues to grow, intermediaries, such as the collective, can be vital liaisons to rapidly integrate and interpret research to support conservation action. Dedicated to the memory of Shiloh Schulte and his conservation achievements for shorebirds.

Bibliographic Information

JournalConservation Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2026-03-23
Publication Year2026
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0888-8892
eISSN1523-1739
DOI10.1111/cobi.70194
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/15231739
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.