NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Measurements of pelagic animal biomass exhibit depth-specific bias when trawl volumes are estimated without a flowmeter

Elan J. Portner; Julia M. Chavarry; Saulo M. Soares; C. Anela Choy
Marine Biology · Vol. 173, Issue 9 · 2026

Abstract

In open ocean systems, trawling with nets remains one of the most common methods for measuring animal biomass in a volume of seawater, calculated as distance traveled multiplied by net mouth area. The effective distance traveled by the net can be measured using a flowmeter, but in the absence of a flowmeter is often estimated as the distance traveled by the trawling vessel. Studies that do not use a flowmeter to quantify trawling effort assume that the rate at which water flows into the net (flow rate) is constant within and among trawls. Similarly, studies that cannot directly measure net mouth area assume its variability is negligible. However, assumptions of constant flow rate and net mouth area are rarely scrutinized and their impacts on volume estimates are poorly understood, especially across sampling depths. We tested these assumptions using a 10 m 2 Multiple Opening/Closing Net and Environmental Sensing System (MOCNESS) and observed ~ 10% variability in both flow rate and net mouth area when trawling between the surface and 2500 m. We then compared measurements of net volume and animal biomass from 160 MOCNESS nets to estimates based on six combinations of common net distance and mouth area metrics. Volume estimation methods using vessel-based estimates of distance traveled or the nominal net mouth area overestimated measured volumes by 15–42% on average, resulting in an average 12–28% underestimation of animal biomass across methods. Estimation errors increased with sampling depth and were largest at depths greater than 1000 m. Using a novel method to predict MOCNESS flow rates based on ship velocity, net depth, and other variables describing trawling conditions, estimation errors relative to measured volumes were minimized and became consistent across depths. The findings from our case study suggest trawl studies that do not directly measure flow rates likely have depth-dependent bias in volume estimates, which has broad implications for our understanding of pelagic ecology and ecosystem services.

Bibliographic Information

JournalMarine Biology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2026-09-01
Publication Year2026
Volume173
Issue9
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0025-3162
eISSN1432-1793
DOI10.1007/s00227-026-04880-z

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1967-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/227
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.