NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Phylogenetic analysis supports the allochthonous origin of gynodioecy in New Zealand Gaultheria Kalm ex L.

Peter W. Fritsch; Lu Lu; Catherine M. Bush; Steven J. Wagstaff; Kathleen A. Kron
New Zealand Journal of Botany · Vol. 59, Issue 2 · pp. 175-197 · 2021

Abstract

The origin and establishment of gender dimorphism has been postulated as a key element in the evolution of insular floras but has generally not been studied in an explicit phylogenetic framework. We tested the prior conclusion that the origin of gender dimorphism in the New Zealand species of Gaultheria Kalm ex L. is allochthonous by newly tracing the evolution of gender dimorphism on a phylogenetic tree of the Wintergreen Clade. We scored species for male sterility and breeding system type (cosexual, gynodioecious, or dioecious) based on the literature, and observations from the field and herbarium specimens. We traced the evolution of gender dimorphism, fruit evolution, and ancestral areas on the tree with parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods. Our analyses revealed that male sterility in New Zealand most likely emanated from a male‐sterile fleshy red‐fruited South American lineage, with reversals to cosexuality in two or three Australian lineages of the more inclusive Australasian Clade. The results support an allochthonous origin of gynodioecy in New Zealand Gaultheria and corroborate arrival of the ancestral ancestor through over‐water dispersal, likely by birds. Although gender dimorphism could have arrived to New Zealand as a preadaptation to avoid inbreeding depression in an island setting, its correlation with fleshy fruit, unspecialised flowers, and woody habit across the genus suggests that factors other than the island setting per se are responsible for its maintenance in New Zealand. Although gender dimorphism in New Zealand has usually arisen autochthonously in dry‐fruited genera, in Gaultheria the presence of gynodioecy in several dry‐fruited species is best explained by its retention from fleshy‐fruited ancestors.

Bibliographic Information

JournalNew Zealand Journal of Botany
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2021-06-01
Publication Year2021
Volume59
Issue2
Pages175-197
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0028-825X
eISSN1175-8643
DOI10.1080/0028825x.2020.1840400
SubjectPlant Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/11758643
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.