Abstract
Disturbance can be an important determinant of stream benthic invertebrate community structure. Whether this is a result of the direct loss of invertebrates, an alteration to the food base of the community by the disturbance, or a combination of both, is never clear. We examined this question by conducting a disturbance experiment under artificial cover where low light limited periphyton growth and minimised the effect of disturbance on periphyton abundance. The experiment was conducted using baskets of natural substrate in a spring‐fed Taranaki Ring Plain stream, Taranaki, New Zealand during February and March 2000. Baskets were placed in the open or under cover and half were disturbed every week for 4 weeks. The artificial cover dramatically reduced periphyton biomass. Presence or absence of cover was the primary determinant of what invertebrate taxa dominated in the baskets, most likely as a result of differences in food resources. The filter feeding Coloburiscus humeralis dominated numerically in the covered baskets, whereas the generalist grazers Deleatidium spp., Beraeoptera roria , Orthocladiinae, and Diamesinae dominated numerically in the open baskets. However, cover had no effect on the overall abundance and species richness of the experimental baskets but disturbance reduced abundance and to a lesser extent species richness.