NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

A stochastic exposure model for seismic risk assessment and pricing of catastrophe bonds

Harsh K. Mistry; Domenico Lombardi
Natural Hazards · Vol. 117, Issue 1 · pp. 803-829 · 2023

Abstract

Risk-based catastrophe bonds require the estimation of losses from the convolution of hazard, exposure and vulnerability models. These models are affected by different uncertainties that arise from the definition of their input parameters. In this paper, we propose a stochastic approach to treat the uncertainty in the asset location and attributes of the exposure model. The proposed method uses the Monte Carlo sampling approach to generate a stochastic exposure database, where each asset location is generated randomly within the geometric bound of the administration, while the asset attributes (i.e. construction type and material, number of storey, building activity type and number of dwelling) are sampled from distributions built from census data. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the influence of the spatial resolution of the exposure model on the average annual losses (AAL) and catastrophe bond prices. To this end, we implement four exposure models, with spatial resolution at the asset, municipality and province levels, on a study region comprising ten provinces in southern Italy. Compared to the proposed model, the exposure model where assets are relocated and aggregated at the geometric centroid of the municipality underestimates AAL by $$8\%$$ 8 % , while a higher difference (up to $$20\%$$ 20 % ) is observed for the exposure model where assets are relocated and aggregated at the geometric centroid of the province. We also consider an exposure model whose asset locations are extracted from publicly available building footprints. Yet, this latter model was incomplete for some provinces resulting in underestimation of AAL up to $$90\%$$ 90 % . Differences in catastrophe bond prices obtained from the four exposure models are less evident, with the exposure model built based on the building footprints showing a difference up to $$9.5\%$$ 9.5 % .

Bibliographic Information

JournalNatural Hazards
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2023-05-01
Publication Year2023
Volume117
Issue1
Pages803-829
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0921-030X
eISSN1573-0840
DOI10.1007/s11069-023-05884-4

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1988-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11069
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.