NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Towards a Better Understanding of Cognitive Deficits in Absence Epilepsy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Eric L. A. Fonseca Wald; Jos G. M. Hendriksen; Gerald S. Drenthen; Sander M. J. V. Kuijk; Albert P. Aldenkamp; Johan S. H. Vles; R. Jeroen Vermeulen; Mariette H. J. A. Debeij-van Hall; Sylvia Klinkenberg
Neuropsychology Review · Vol. 29, Issue 4 · pp. 421-449 · 2019

Abstract

Cognition in absence epilepsy (AE) is generally considered undisturbed. However, reports on cognitive deficits in AE in recent years have suggested otherwise. This review systematically assesses current literature on cognitive performance in children with AE. A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science. All studies reporting on cognitive performance in children with AE were considered. In total 33 studies were eligible for inclusion. Neuropsychological tests were classified into the following domains: intelligence; executive function; attention; language; motor & sensory-perceptual examinations; visuoperceptual/visuospatial/visuoconstructional function; memory and learning; achievement. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted by estimating the pooled mean and/or pooling the mean difference in case-control studies. Full-scale IQ in children with AE was estimated at 96.78 (95%CI:94.46–99.10) across all available studies and in case-control studies IQ was on average 8.03 (95%CI:-10.45- -5.61) lower. Verbal IQ was estimated at 97.98 (95%CI:95.80–100.16) for all studies and 9.01 (95%CI:12.11- -5.90) points lower in case-control studies. Performance IQ was estimated at 97.23 (93.24–101.22) for all available studies and 5.32 (95%CI:-8.27–2.36) points lower in case-control studies. Lower performance was most often reported in executive function (cognitive flexibility, planning, and verbal fluency) and attention (sustained, selective and divided attention). Reports on school difficulties, neurodevelopmental problems, and attentional problems were high. In conclusion, in contrast to common beliefs, lower than average neurocognitive performance was noted in multiple cognitive domains, which may influence academic and psychosocial development.

Bibliographic Information

JournalNeuropsychology Review
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2019-12-01
Publication Year2019
Volume29
Issue4
Pages421-449
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1040-7308
eISSN1573-6660
DOI10.1007/s11065-019-09419-2

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1990-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11065
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.