NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Hospital and laboratory outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who received vitamin D supplementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mohamed Sayed Zaazouee; Mahmoud Eleisawy; Amira M. Abdalalaziz; Mahmoud M. Elhady; Omar Adel Ali; Taghreed Mohamed Abdelbari; Sara Mohamed Hasan; Hossam Waleed Almadhoon; Alaa Yehia Ahmed; Alaa Shaban Fassad; Rewan Elgendy; Eman Adnan Abdel-Baset; Hamis A. Elsayed; Ahmed Bostamy Elsnhory; Alaa Bahaaeldin Abdraboh; Hazem Metwally Faragalla; Alaa Ahmed Elshanbary; Osama A. Kensara; Mohamed M. Abdel-Daim
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology · Vol. 396, Issue 4 · pp. 607-620 · 2023

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a wide-ranging spectrum of clinical symptoms, from asymptomatic/mild to severe. Recent research indicates that, among several factors, a low vitamin D level is a modifiable risk factor for COVID-19 patients. This study aims to evaluate the effect of vitamin D on hospital and laboratory outcomes of patients with COVID-19. Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and clinicaltrials.gov were searched until July 2022, using relevant keywords/Mesh terms. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that addressed the topic were included. The Cochrane tool was used to assess the studies’ risk of bias, and the data were analyzed using the review manager (RevMan 5.4). We included nine RCTs with 1586 confirmed COVID-19 patients. Vitamin D group showed a significant reduction of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (risk ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.41, 0.84], P = 0.003), and higher change in vitamin D level (standardized mean difference = 2.27, 95% CI [2.08, 2.47], P < 0.00001) compared to the control group. Other studied hospital and laboratory outcomes showed non-significant difference between vitamin D and the control group ( P ≥ 0.05). In conclusion, vitamin D reduced the risk of ICU admission and showed superiority in changing vitamin D level compared to the control group. However, other outcomes showed no difference between the two groups. More RCTs are needed to confirm these results.

Bibliographic Information

JournalNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2023-04-01
Publication Year2023
Volume396
Issue4
Pages607-620
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0028-1298
eISSN1432-1912
DOI10.1007/s00210-022-02360-x

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1873-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/210
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.