NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Canola productivity and carbon footprint under different cropping systems in eastern Canada

Bao-Luo Ma; Chang Liang; Aruna Herath; C. D. Caldwell; Donald L. Smith
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · Vol. 127, Issue 2 · pp. 191-207 · 2023

Abstract

Diversified crop rotation with an appropriate sequence may be a promising strategy for increasing crop productivity while reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and lowering carbon (C) footprint for more sustainable agricultural systems. The objectives of this study were to (i) assess the agronomic performance and C footprint of canola ( Brassica napus L.) production in different cropping systems, and (ii) better understand how canola could be adapted to existing cropping systems in eastern Canada. A four-year canola-based phase rotation study, including maize ( Zea mays L.), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and soybean ( Glycine max L.), started in 2011 and continued for two cycles in Ottawa, ON; Montreal, QC; and Canning, NS. It was found that, compared to continuous monoculture (canola, maize or wheat), diversified cropping systems increased crop yields by an average of 32% and reduced the C footprint of all rotations by 33%, except under severe heat and drought conditions. The effect of rotation on yield and C footprint of canola production varied significantly among site-years. At Ottawa, the canola following soybean (SC) had 12% higher canola yield than monoculture canola (CC), 5 and 8% higher canola yield than canola following wheat (WC) or maize (MC). At Montreal, canola yield ranked as MC > SC > WC > CC. At Canning, the highest canola yield was in WC (21%) and SC (13%). Overall, most SC rotations had the lowest C footprint, and CC cropping had the highest C footprint, with only a few exceptions. Regardless of the cropping system, canola required more N input and was high in oil and protein in the harvested product, and produced the highest C footprint, while soybean had the lowest C footprint at all three sites. Our findings indicate that a diversified cropping system with canola production following soybean significantly improved canola yield while lowering the C footprint. However, profitable and sustainable canola production in eastern Canada is threatened by climate change-induced drought and heat stress.

Bibliographic Information

JournalNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2023-11-01
Publication Year2023
Volume127
Issue2
Pages191-207
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1385-1314
eISSN1573-0867
DOI10.1007/s10705-023-10294-w

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1980-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/10705
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.