NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Neural cue reactivity and intrinsic functional connectivity in individuals with alcohol use disorder following treatment with topiramate or naltrexone

Warren B. Logge; Paul S. Haber; Tristan Hurzeler; Hugh Gallagher; Henry Kranzler; Kirsten C. Morley
Psychopharmacology · Vol. 242, Issue 7 · pp. 1641-1652 · 2025

Abstract

Rationale Both topiramate and naltrexone have been shown to affect neural alcohol cue reactivity in alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, their comparative effects on alcohol cue reactivity are unknown. Moreover, while naltrexone has been found to normalize hyperactive localized network connectivity implicated in AUD, no studies have examined the effect of topiramate on intrinsic functional connectivity or compared functional connectivity between these two widely used medications. Objective This study compared topiramate versus naltrexone on alcohol cue-elicited brain activation and intrinsic functional connectivity in patients with alcohol use disorder. Methods Forty-seven participants with alcohol use disorder received daily topiramate (titrating the dose up to 200 mg/day n = 21) or naltrexone (50 mg/day, n = 26) for at least 6 weeks. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined intrinsic functional connectivity during rest and alcohol cue-elicited neural activation during a visual alcohol cue reactivity task 120 min following treatment administration. Functional connectivity and alcohol cue reactivity and percentage of heavy drinking days (% HDD) associations were assessed. Results No differences in either intrinsic functional connectivity or alcohol cue-elicited neural activity were seen between topiramate and naltrexone-treated groups. Overall, participants showed increased alcohol cue-elicited activation in three clusters spanning occipital regions involved in visual recognition of stimuli, and hypoactivation to both alcohol and control cues in three clusters involved in salience attribution and processing of emotional valence of external stimuli. No differences between topiramate versus naltrexone were observed for either functional measure or associations with post-scan % HDD. Conclusions Topiramate and naltrexone enacted comparable alcohol cue reactivity and intrinsic functional connectivity patterns. Some overall responses of increased brain activation to alcohol cues in visual processing regions coupled with reduced activation to alcohol and control cues were evidenced for both treatments. These activation patterns were in regions expected to show attenuation of brain activity resulting from treatment. Topiramate and naltrexone may thus enact functional effects through similar modulation of functional neural activity in individuals with AUD. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03479086 https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03479086 .

Bibliographic Information

JournalPsychopharmacology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-07-01
Publication Year2025
Volume242
Issue7
Pages1641-1652
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0033-3158
eISSN1432-2072
DOI10.1007/s00213-025-06745-7

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1959-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/213
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.