NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Effect of muscarinic blockade on the speed of attention shifting, read-out delays and learning

Alexander Thiele; Agnes McDonald Milner; Corwyn Hall; Lucy Mayhew; Anthony Carter; Sidharth Sanjeev
Psychopharmacology · Vol. 242, Issue 8 · pp. 1757-1768 · 2025

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate to what extent blockade of muscarinic receptors affects the speed of endogenous versus exogenous attentional shift times, and how it affects learning of attention shifting, cue detection and signal readout. Subjects viewed an array of 10 moving clocks and reported the time a clock indicated when cued. Target clocks were indicated by peripheral or central cues, including conditions of pre-cuing. For peripheral and central cuing, it yielded a compound measure of how long it took to detect the cue, shift attention to the relevant clock and read the time on the clock. For the pre-cue condition it yielded a measure of how long it took to detect the cue and read the time on the clock when attention could have been pre-allocated to the target clock. In study 1, each subject participated in 2 sessions (scopolamine/placebo), whereby the order of drug intake was counterbalanced across subjects, and subjects were blinded to conditions. Scopolamine/placebo was administered before a psychophysical experiment was conducted. In study 2, the effect of muscarinic blockade on learning induced improvements of cue detection, attention shift times (for exogenous and endogenous conditions), and signal readout was investigated. Here scopolamine/placebo was administered immediately after the first (of two) psychophysical sessions, whereby a given subject either received scopolamine or placebo pills. Confirming previous results, we show that pre-cuing resulted in the shortest read-out delays, followed by exogenous cuing, with endogenous read-out delays being slowest. Scopolamine application increased readout-delays in a dose dependent manner. This was mainly driven by increased readout-delays for pre-cue conditions, and to some extent for exogenous cue conditions. It suggests that muscarinic blockade affected the ability to pre-allocated attention to a cued location, as well as to react to peripheral cues. Additionally, blockade of muscarinic receptors immediately after the first session reduced learning dependent improvement of read-out delays. These results demonstrate that muscarinic receptors play an important in detecting cues, and fast read-out of cued information, and they contribute to the learning thereof.

Bibliographic Information

JournalPsychopharmacology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-08-01
Publication Year2025
Volume242
Issue8
Pages1757-1768
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0033-3158
eISSN1432-2072
DOI10.1007/s00213-025-06757-3

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1959-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/213
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.