NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

16p11.2 duplication and NMDA receptor antagonism have distinct impacts on reward learning and decision making

Dana Mueller; Evan Knep; Angelica Velosa; Erin Giglio; Cathy S. Chen; Sarah R. Heilbronner; R. Becket Ebitz; Patrick E. Rothwell; Nicola M. Grissom
Psychopharmacology · 2026

Abstract

Rationale 16p11.2 duplication is associated with numerous neuropsychiatric conditions at a genome-wide level, including psychosis. Mice modeling 16p11.2 duplication may provide important insights into cognitive risk factors, in particular in reward-guided decision making. NMDAR function has also been implicated in psychosis phenotypes, but whether these phenotypes differ by genetic risk factor is unknown. Objectives We aimed to: (1) identify sex and genotype differences in early operant training and two-arm spatial restless bandit task performance; (2) examine the effects of an NMDAR antagonist on task performance and strategy across genotypes. Methods 16p11.2 duplication and wildtype mice completed a series of training schedules of escalating difficulty followed by bandit tasks. MK-801 and saline were administered in alternating sessions prior to later bandit task performance. Results Large sex differences in early operant training revealed some male-biased impacts of 16p11.2 duplication, contingent on training schedule difficulty. Once on the two-arm spatial restless bandit task, 16p11.2 duplication was no longer a strong contributor to decision making. However, MK-801 decreased the tendency to stay with a rewarded choice, lowered the probability of selecting the highest rewarded option, and decreased the influence of prior outcomes on choice. Conclusions The male-biased vulnerability in early operant training suggests that strategies for learning early schemas or in novel environments may be impacted by 16p11.2 duplication in males. In contrast, NMDAR are influential in the ability to flexibly switch between choices, and disrupting this function significantly impairs decision making in all animals.

Bibliographic Information

JournalPsychopharmacology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2026-05-14
Publication Year2026
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0033-3158
eISSN1432-2072
DOI10.1007/s00213-026-07081-0

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1959-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/213
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.