NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Predicting and assessing the impacts of COVID-19 disruption on marine science and sectors in Australia

Alistair J. Hobday; Vicki M. Walters; Robert L. Stephenson; Shane Baylis; Cindy Bessey; Fabio Boschetti; Catherine Bulman; Stephanie Contardo; Jeffrey M. Dambacher; Jemery Day; Natalie A. Dowling; Piers Dunstan; J. Paige Eveson; Jessica H. Farley; Mark Green; Elizabeth A. Fulton; Peter Grewe; Haris Kunnath; Andrew Lenton; Mary Mackay; Karlie S. McDonald; Jess Melbourne-Thomas; Chris Moeseneder; Sean Pascoe; Toby A. Patterson; Heidi Pethybridge; Éva E. Plagányi; Gabriela Scheufele; Qamar Schuyler; Joanna Strzelecki; Robin Thomson; E. Ingrid van Putten; Chris Wilcox
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · Vol. 35, Issue 1 · pp. 241-278 · 2025

Abstract

By March 2020 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was anticipated to present a major challenge to the work undertaken by scientists. This pandemic could be considered just one of the shocks that human society has had and will be likely to confront again in the future. As strategic thinking about the future can assist performance and planning of scientific research in the face of change, the pandemic presented an opportunity to evaluate the performance of marine researchers in prediction of future outcomes. In March 2020, two groups of researchers predicted outcomes for the Australian marine research sector, and then evaluated these predictions after 18 months. The self-assessed coping ability of a group experienced in ‘futures studies’ was not higher than the less-experienced group, suggesting that scientists in general may be well placed to cope with shocks. A range of changes to scientific endeavours (e.g., travel, fieldwork) and to marine sectors (e.g., fisheries, biodiversity) were predicted over the first 12–18 months of COVID-19 disruption. The predicted direction of change was generally correct (56%) or neutral (25%) for predictions related to the scientific endeavour, and correct (73%) or mixed (9%) for predictions related to sectors that are the focus of marine research. The success of this foresighting experiment suggests that the collective wisdom of scientists can be used by their organisations to consider the impact of shocks and disruptions and to better prepare for and cope with shocks. Graphical abstract Word cloud analysis of free text responses to questions about expected impact of COVID-19 on the activities associated with marine science

Bibliographic Information

JournalReviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-03-01
Publication Year2025
Volume35
Issue1
Pages241-278
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0960-3166
eISSN1573-5184
DOI10.1007/s11160-024-09899-3

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1991-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11160
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.