NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Machine Learning Analysis of Individual Tumor Lesions in Four Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Clinical Studies: Linking Tumor Heterogeneity to Overall Survival

Diego Vera-Yunca; Pascal Girard; Zinnia P. Parra-Guillen; Alain Munafo; Iñaki F. Trocóniz; Nadia Terranova
The AAPS Journal · Vol. 22, Issue 3 · 2020

Abstract

Total tumor size (TS) metrics used in TS models in oncology do not consider tumor heterogeneity, which could help to better predict drug efficacy. We analyzed individual target lesions (iTLs) of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) to determine differences in TS dynamics by using the ClassIfication Clustering of Individual Lesions (CICIL) methodology. Results from subgroup analyses comparing genetic mutations and TS metrics were assessed and applied to survival analyses. Data from four mCRC clinical studies were analyzed (1781 patients, 6369 iTLs). CICIL was used to assess differences in lesion TS dynamics within a tissue (intra-class) or across different tissues (inter-class). First, lesions were automatically classified based on their location. Cross-correlation coefficients (CCs) determined if each pair of lesions followed similar or opposite dynamics. Finally, CCs were grouped by using the K-means clustering method. Heterogeneity in tumor dynamics was lower in the intra-class analysis than in the inter-class analysis for patients receiving cetuximab. More tumor heterogeneity was found in KRAS mutated patients compared to KRAS wild-type (KRASwt) patients and when using sum of longest diameters versus sum of products of diameters. Tumor heterogeneity quantified as the median patient’s CC was found to be a predictor of overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.08–1.92), especially in KRASwt patients. Intra- and inter-tumor tissue heterogeneities were assessed with CICIL. Derived metrics of heterogeneity were found to be a predictor of OS time. Considering differences between lesions’ TS dynamics could improve oncology models in favor of a better prediction of OS.

Bibliographic Information

JournalThe AAPS Journal
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2020-05-01
Publication Year2020
Volume22
Issue3
Document TypeJournal Article
eISSN1550-7416
DOI10.1208/s12248-020-0434-7

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1999-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/12248
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.