NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Performance of MPAS-A and WRF in predicting and simulating western North Pacific tropical cyclone tracks and intensities

Yuk Sing Lui; Louis Kwan Shu Tse; Chi-Yung Tam; King Heng Lau; Jilong Chen
Theoretical and Applied Climatology · Vol. 143, Issue 1-2 · pp. 505-520 · 2021

Abstract

Performances of the Model for Prediction Across Scales-Atmosphere (MPAS-A) in predicting and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in simulating western North Pacific (WNP) tropical cyclone (TC) tracks and intensities have been compared. Parallel simulations of the same historical storms that made landfall over southern China, namely, TCs Hope (1979), Gordon (1989), Koryn (1993), Imbudo (2003), Dujuan (2003), Molave (2009), Hato (2017) and Mangkhut (2018), were carried out using WRF and MPAS-A, with initial conditions (and, for WRF, lateral boundary conditions as well) taken from ERA-interim. For MPAS-A, the model was integrated using a standard 60-to-3-km variable-resolution global grid mesh and also on 160-to-2-km grids customized to cover the TC tracks with the highest resolution mesh. The WRF model was integrated using a 15-km/3-km nested domain. No TC bogus scheme was applied when initializing the MPAS-A and WRF simulations. It was found that while TC tracks were reasonably captured by the two models configured variously, the storm intensities were underestimated in general. Given MPAS-A runs were initial value predictions whereas WRF runs were dynamically downscaled from ERA-interim, the finding that MPAS-A has comparable (or slightly better) performance as (than) WRF is noteworthy. To further examine the sensitivity of the MPAS-A TC forecasts to the initial data, additional experiments were carried out for TCs Molave and Hope using ERA5 reanalysis as initial conditions. The ERA5 initialized runs showed significant (slight) improvement in intensity (track) evolution, suggesting that the underestimated TC intensity is likely related to inferior representation of storms in the ERA-interim initial fields. Furthermore, additional runs using another customized 60-to-2-km mesh showed a reasonable improvement in capturing the TC tracks, suggesting that the track forecast accuracy of MPAS-A in TC can be sensitive to the grid resolution in the coarsest part of the variable-resolution mesh used.

Bibliographic Information

JournalTheoretical and Applied Climatology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2021-01-01
Publication Year2021
Volume143
Issue1-2
Pages505-520
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0177-798X
eISSN1434-4483
DOI10.1007/s00704-020-03444-5

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1948-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/704
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.