NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Long‐Term Research in Ecology and Evolution ( LTREE ): 2015 survey data

Mark A. Bradford; Anthony Leiserowitz; Geoffrey Feinberg; Seth A. Rosenthal; Jennifer A. Lau
Ecology · Vol. 98, Issue 11 · pp. 2980-2980 · 2017

Abstract

To systematically assess views on contributions and future activities for long‐term research in ecology and evolution ( LTREE ), we conducted and here provide data responses and associated metadata for a survey of ecological and evolutionary scientists. The survey objectives were to: (1) Identify and prioritize research questions that are important to address through long‐term, ecological field experiments; and (2) understand the role that these experiments might play in generating and applying ecological and evolutionary knowledge. The survey was developed adhering to the standards of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. It was administered online using Qualtrics Survey Software. Survey creation was a multi‐step process, with questions and format developed and then revised with, for example, input from an external advisory committee comprising senior and junior ecological and evolutionary researchers. The final questionnaire was released to ~100 colleagues to ensure functionality and then fielded 2 d later (January 7 th , 2015). Two professional societies distributed it to their membership, including the Ecological Society of America, and it was posted to three list serves. The questionnaire was available through February 8th 2015 and completed by 1,179 respondents. The distribution approach targeted practicing ecologists and evolutionary biologists in the U.S. Quantitative (both ordinal and categorical) closed‐ended questions used a predefined set of response categories, facilitating direct comparison across all respondents. Qualitative, open‐ended questions, provided respondents the opportunity to develop their own answers. We employed quantitative questions to score views on the extent to which long‐term experimental research has contributed to understanding in ecology and evolutionary biology; its role compared to other approaches (e.g., short‐term experiments); justifications for and caveats to long‐term experiments; and the relative importance of incentives for conducting long‐term research. Qualitative questions were used to assess community views on the most important topics and questions for long‐term research to address, and primary incentives and challenges to realizing this work. Finally, demographic data were collected to determine if views were conditional on such things as years of experience and field of expertise. The final questionnaire and all responses are provided for unrestricted use.

Bibliographic Information

JournalEcology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2017-11-01
Publication Year2017
Volume98
Issue11
Pages2980-2980
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0012-9658
eISSN1939-9170
DOI10.1002/ecy.1999
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/19399170
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.