NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Priorities, concerns, and potential compromises amongst urban forest stakeholders: international lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand

Thomas F. Carlin; Tim Barnard; Toby Chapman; Justin Morgenroth; Daniel R. Richards; Robyn Simcock; Jonathon Avery; Zoë Avery; Yvette Dickinson; Kate Elliot; Claire Freeman; Derek Hayes; Yolanda van Heezik; Kelly Hertzog; Rebecca Kiddle; Brent Martin; William Melville; Tipene Merritt; Colin Meurk; Tamara Mutu; Mirjam Schindler; Alison Slade; David Spencer; Margaret C. Stanley; David Stejskal; Mason Walker; Christopher Walsh; Sylvia Tapuke
Urban Ecosystems · Vol. 28, Issue 5 · 2025

Abstract

Urban forests provide numerous benefits including habitat for wildlife, improving human health, purifying air and water, and preventing and mitigating the effects of climate change. The need to protect and improve our urban forests will only increase as populations increase and cities densify and expand over time. However, urban forest establishment and maintenance is challenging due to a lack of effective policies, delays, lack of communication, inappropriate targets, and lack of recognition, disunity, or resourcing amongst stakeholders. Here we present the results from a joint urban forest symposium-workshop that sought to determine the priorities and challenges of different stakeholder groups in New Zealand, including arborists, ecologists, non-ecologist researchers, indigenous peoples, and planners. We synthesise these lessons as recommendations to improve urban forest planning, design, establishment, and minimise conflicts between stakeholder groups. While the highest priorities of each stakeholder group are fairly distinct, there are high levels of overlap in the general priorities and challenges they face in working towards advancing those priorities. We suggest a 3-phase framework to deliver progress that broadly considers (1) data collection, (2) policy development, and (3) resource development. We suggest this framework should be supported by continual monitoring and data sharing, an increased investment in green employment and education, and further recognition of urban foresters, indigenous communities, and ecologists. We suggest that an inclusive approach based on a shared understanding of forest values and removing barriers is most likely to result in long-term success.

Bibliographic Information

JournalUrban Ecosystems
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-10-01
Publication Year2025
Volume28
Issue5
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1083-8155
eISSN1573-1642
DOI10.1007/s11252-025-01801-8

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11252
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.