NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Functional traits driving species role in the structure of terrestrial vertebrate scavenger networks

Esther Sebastián‐González; Zebensui Morales‐Reyes; Francisco Botella; Lara Naves‐Alegre; Juan M. Pérez‐García; Patricia Mateo‐Tomás; Pedro P. Olea; Marcos Moleón; Jomar Magalhães Barbosa; Fernando Hiraldo; Eneko Arrondo; José A. Donázar; Ainara Cortés‐Avizanda; Nuria Selva; Sergio A. Lambertucci; Aishwarya Bhattacharjee; Alexis L. Brewer; Erin F. Abernethy; Kelsey L. Turner; James C. Beasley; Travis L. DeVault; Hannah C. Gerke; Olin E. Rhodes; Andrés Ordiz; Camilla Wikenros; Barbara Zimmermann; Petter Wabakken; Christopher C. Wilmers; Justine A. Smith; Corinne J. Kendall; Darcy Ogada; Ethan Frehner; Maximilian L. Allen; Heiko U. Wittmer; James R. A. Butler; Johan T. du Toit; Antoni Margalida; Pilar Oliva‐Vidal; David Wilson; Klemen Jerina; Miha Krofel; Rich Kostecke; Richard Inger; Esra Per; Yunus Ayhan; Mehmet Sancı; Ünsal Yılmazer; Akino Inagaki; Shinsuke Koike; Arockianathan Samson; Paula L. Perrig; Emma E. Spencer; Thomas M. Newsome; Marco Heurich; José D. Anadón; Evan R. Buechley; Cayetano Gutiérrez‐Cánovas; L. Mark Elbroch; José A. Sánchez‐Zapata
Ecology · Vol. 102, Issue 12 · 2021

Abstract

Species assemblages often have a non‐random nested organization, which in vertebrate scavenger (carrion‐consuming) assemblages is thought to be driven by facilitation in competitive environments. However, not all scavenger species play the same role in maintaining assemblage structure, as some species are obligate scavengers (i.e., vultures) and others are facultative, scavenging opportunistically. We used a database with 177 vertebrate scavenger species from 53 assemblages in 22 countries across five continents to identify which functional traits of scavenger species are key to maintaining the scavenging network structure. We used network analyses to relate ten traits hypothesized to affect assemblage structure with the “role” of each species in the scavenging assemblage in which it appeared. We characterized the role of a species in terms of both the proportion of monitored carcasses on which that species scavenged, or scavenging breadth (i.e., the species “normalized degree”), and the role of that species in the nested structure of the assemblage (i.e., the species “paired nested degree”), therefore identifying possible facilitative interactions among species. We found that species with high olfactory acuity, social foragers, and obligate scavengers had the widest scavenging breadth. We also found that social foragers had a large paired nested degree in scavenger assemblages, probably because their presence is easier to detect by other species to signal carcass occurrence. Our study highlights differences in the functional roles of scavenger species and can be used to identify key species for targeted conservation to maintain the ecological function of scavenger assemblages.

Bibliographic Information

JournalEcology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2021-12-01
Publication Year2021
Volume102
Issue12
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0012-9658
eISSN1939-9170
DOI10.1002/ecy.3519
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/19399170
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.