Abstract
Historical resurveys of ecological communities are important for placing the structure of modern ecosystems in context. Rarely, however, are snapshot surveys alone sufficient for providing direct insight into the rates of the ecological processes underlying community functioning, either now or in the past. In this study, I used a statistically reasoned observational approach to estimate the feeding rates of a New Zealand intertidal predator, Haustrum haustorium , using diet surveys performed at several sites by Robert Paine in 1968–1969 and by me in 2004. Comparisons between time periods reveal a remarkable consistency in the predator's prey‐specific feeding rates, which contrasts with the changes I observed in prey abundances, the predator's body‐size distribution, and the prey's proportional contributions to the predator's apparent diet. Although these and additional changes in the predator's per‐capita attack rates seem to show adaptive changes in its prey preferences, they do not. Rather, feeding‐rate stability is an inherently statistical consequence of the predator's high among‐prey variation in handling times which determine the length of time that feeding events will remain detectable to observers performing diet surveys. Though understudied, similarly high among‐prey variation in handling (or digestion) times is evident in many predator species throughout the animal kingdom. The resultant disconnect between a predator's apparent diet and its actual feeding rates suggests that much of the temporal, biogeographic, and seemingly context‐dependent variation that is often perceived in community structure, predator diets, and food‐web topology may be of less functional consequence than assumed. Qualitative changes in ecological pattern need not represent qualitative changes in ecological process.