NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal

Catherine E. Sheppard; Richard Inger; Robbie A. McDonald; Sam Barker; Andrew L. Jackson; Faye J. Thompson; Emma I. K. Vitikainen; Michael A. Cant; Harry H. Marshall
Ecology Letters · Vol. 21, Issue 5 · pp. 665-673 · 2018

Abstract

Individual foraging specialisation has important ecological implications, but its causes in group‐living species are unclear. One of the major consequences of group living is increased intragroup competition for resources. Foraging theory predicts that with increased competition, individuals should add new prey items to their diet, widening their foraging niche (‘optimal foraging hypothesis’). However, classic competition theory suggests the opposite: that increased competition leads to niche partitioning and greater individual foraging specialisation (‘niche partitioning hypothesis’). We tested these opposing predictions in wild, group‐living banded mongooses ( Mungos mungo ), using stable isotope analysis of banded mongoose whiskers to quantify individual and group foraging niche. Individual foraging niche size declined with increasing group size, despite all groups having a similar overall niche size. Our findings support the prediction that competition promotes niche partitioning within social groups and suggest that individual foraging specialisation may play an important role in the formation of stable social groupings.

Bibliographic Information

JournalEcology Letters
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2018-05-01
Publication Year2018
Volume21
Issue5
Pages665-673
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1461-023X
eISSN1461-0248
DOI10.1111/ele.12933
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1998-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/14610248
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.