Abstract
Experiments often find that net primary productivity (NPP) increases with species richness when native species are considered. However, relationships may be altered by exotic (non‐native) species, which are hypothesized to reduce richness but increase productivity (i.e., ‘invasion‐diversity‐productivity paradox’). We compared richness‐NPP relationships using a comparison of exotic versus native‐dominated sites across the central USA, and two experiments under common environments. Aboveground NPP was measured using peak biomass clipping in all three studies, and belowground NPP was measured in one study with root ingrowth cores using root‐free soil. In all studies, there was a significantly positive relationship between NPP and richness across native species‐dominated sites and plots, but no relationship across exotic‐dominated ones. These results indicate that relationships between NPP and richness depend on whether native or exotic species are dominant, and that exotic species are ‘breaking the rules', altering richness‐productivity and richness‐C stock relationships after invasion.