Abstract
Ecosystem models are often used to predict the consequences of management interventions in applied ecology and conservation. These models are often high‐dimensional and nonlinear, yet limited data are available to calibrate or validate them. Consequently, their utility as decision‐support tools is unclear. In this paper, we calibrate ecosystem models to time series data from 110 different experimental microcosm ecosystems, each containing three to five interacting species. Then, we assess their ability to predict the consequences of management interventions. Our results show that for each time series dataset, multiple divergent parameter sets offer equivalent, good fits. However, these models have poor predictive accuracy when forecasting future dynamics or when predicting how the ecosystem will respond to management intervention. Closer inspection reveals that the models fail because calibration cannot determine the nature of the interspecific interactions. Our findings question whether ecosystem models can support applied ecological decision‐making when calibrated against real‐world datasets.