NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods

Alice Krebs; Barbara M. A. van Vugt-Lussenburg; Tanja Waldmann; Wiebke Albrecht; Jan Boei; Bas ter Braak; Maja Brajnik; Thomas Braunbeck; Tim Brecklinghaus; Francois Busquet; Andras Dinnyes; Joh Dokler; Xenia Dolde; Thomas E. Exner; Ciarán Fisher; David Fluri; Anna Forsby; Jan G. Hengstler; Anna-Katharina Holzer; Zofia Janstova; Paul Jennings; Jaffar Kisitu; Julianna Kobolak; Manoj Kumar; Alice Limonciel; Jessica Lundqvist; Balázs Mihalik; Wolfgang Moritz; Giorgia Pallocca; Andrea Paola Cediel Ulloa; Manuel Pastor; Costanza Rovida; Ugis Sarkans; Johannes P. Schimming; Bela Z. Schmidt; Regina Stöber; Tobias Strassfeld; Bob van de Water; Anja Wilmes; Bart van der Burg; Catherine M. Verfaillie; Rebecca von Hellfeld; Harry Vrieling; Nanette G. Vrijenhoek; Marcel Leist
Archives of Toxicology · Vol. 94, Issue 7 · pp. 2435-2461 · 2020

Abstract

Hazard assessment, based on new approach methods (NAM), requires the use of batteries of assays, where individual tests may be contributed by different laboratories. A unified strategy for such collaborative testing is presented. It details all procedures required to allow test information to be usable for integrated hazard assessment, strategic project decisions and/or for regulatory purposes. The EU-ToxRisk project developed a strategy to provide regulatorily valid data, and exemplified this using a panel of > 20 assays (with > 50 individual endpoints), each exposed to 19 well-known test compounds (e.g. rotenone, colchicine, mercury, paracetamol, rifampicine, paraquat, taxol). Examples of strategy implementation are provided for all aspects required to ensure data validity: (i) documentation of test methods in a publicly accessible database; (ii) deposition of standard operating procedures (SOP) at the European Union DB-ALM repository; (iii) test readiness scoring accoding to defined criteria; (iv) disclosure of the pipeline for data processing; (v) link of uncertainty measures and metadata to the data; (vi) definition of test chemicals, their handling and their behavior in test media; (vii) specification of the test purpose and overall evaluation plans. Moreover, data generation was exemplified by providing results from 25 reporter assays. A complete evaluation of the entire test battery will be described elsewhere. A major learning from the retrospective analysis of this large testing project was the need for thorough definitions of the above strategy aspects, ideally in form of a study pre-registration, to allow adequate interpretation of the data and to ensure overall scientific/toxicological validity.

Bibliographic Information

JournalArchives of Toxicology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2020-07-01
Publication Year2020
Volume94
Issue7
Pages2435-2461
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0340-5761
eISSN1432-0738
DOI10.1007/s00204-020-02802-6

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1930-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/204
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.