NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in electric eel and human donor blood: an in vitro approach to investigate interspecies differences and human variability in toxicodynamics

Emma E. J. Kasteel; Sandra M. Nijmeijer; Keyvin Darney; Leonie S. Lautz; Jean Lou C. M. Dorne; Nynke I. Kramer; Remco H. S. Westerink
Archives of Toxicology · Vol. 94, Issue 12 · pp. 4055-4065 · 2020

Abstract

In chemical risk assessment, default uncertainty factors are used to account for interspecies and interindividual differences, and differences in toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics herein. However, these default factors come with little scientific support. Therefore, our aim was to develop an in vitro method, using acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition as a proof of principle, to assess both interspecies and interindividual differences in toxicodynamics. Electric eel enzyme and human blood of 20 different donors (12 men/8 women) were exposed to eight different compounds (chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-oxon, phosmet, phosmet-oxon, diazinon, diazinon-oxon, pirimicarb, rivastigmine) and inhibition of AChE was measured using the Ellman method. The organophosphate parent compounds, chlorpyrifos, phosmet and diazinon, did not show inhibition of AChE. All other compounds showed concentration-dependent inhibition of AChE, with IC 50 s in human blood ranging from 0.2–29 µM and IC 20 s ranging from 0.1–18 µM, indicating that AChE is inhibited at concentrations relevant to the in vivo human situation. The oxon analogues were more potent inhibitors of electric eel AChE compared to human AChE. The opposite was true for carbamates, pointing towards interspecies differences for AChE inhibition. Human interindividual variability was low and ranged from 5–25%, depending on the concentration. This study provides a reliable in vitro method for assessing human variability in AChE toxicodynamics. The data suggest that the default uncertainty factor of ~ 3.16 may overestimate human variability for this toxicity endpoint, implying that specific toxicodynamic-related adjustment factors can support quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolations that link kinetic and dynamic data to improve chemical risk assessment.

Bibliographic Information

JournalArchives of Toxicology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2020-12-01
Publication Year2020
Volume94
Issue12
Pages4055-4065
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0340-5761
eISSN1432-0738
DOI10.1007/s00204-020-02927-8

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1930-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/204
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.