NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe−/− mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract

Ee Tsin Wong; Justyna Szostak; Bjoern Titz; Tom Lee; Sin Kei Wong; Oksana Lavrynenko; Celine Merg; Maica Corciulo; Jovan Simicevic; Mehdi Auberson; Dariusz Peric; Remi Dulize; David Bornand; Guo Jie Loh; Kyeonghee Monica Lee; Jingjie Zhang; John H. Miller; Walter K. Schlage; Emmanuel Guedj; Thomas Schneider; Blaine Phillips; Patrice Leroy; Mohamed Amin Choukrallah; Nicolas Sierro; Ansgar Buettner; Yang Xiang; Arkadiusz Kuczaj; Nikolai V. Ivanov; Karsta Luettich; Patrick Vanscheeuwijck; Manuel C. Peitsch; Julia Hoeng
Archives of Toxicology · Vol. 95, Issue 5 · pp. 1805-1829 · 2021

Abstract

Cigarette smoking is the major cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Considerable attention has been paid to the reduced harm potential of nicotine-containing inhalable products such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). We investigated the effects of mainstream cigarette smoke (CS) and e-vapor aerosols (containing nicotine and flavor) generated by a capillary aerosol generator on emphysematous changes, lung function, and molecular alterations in the respiratory system of female Apoe −/− mice. Mice were exposed daily (3 h/day, 5 days/week) for 6 months to aerosols from three different e-vapor formulations—(1) carrier (propylene glycol and vegetable glycerol), (2) base (carrier and nicotine), or (3) test (base and flavor)—or to CS from 3R4F reference cigarettes. The CS and base/test aerosol concentrations were matched at 35 µg nicotine/L. CS exposure, but not e-vapor exposure, led to impairment of lung function (pressure–volume loop area, A and K parameters, quasi-static elastance and compliance) and caused marked lung inflammation and emphysematous changes, which were confirmed histopathologically and morphometrically. CS exposure caused lung transcriptome (activation of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses), lipidome, and proteome dysregulation and changes in DNA methylation; in contrast, these effects were substantially reduced in response to the e-vapor aerosol exposure. Compared with sham, aerosol exposure (carrier, base, and test) caused a slight impact on lung inflammation and epithelia irritation. Our results demonstrated that, in comparison with CS, e-vapor aerosols induced substantially lower biological and pathological changes in the respiratory tract associated with chronic inflammation and emphysema.

Bibliographic Information

JournalArchives of Toxicology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2021-05-01
Publication Year2021
Volume95
Issue5
Pages1805-1829
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0340-5761
eISSN1432-0738
DOI10.1007/s00204-021-03020-4

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1930-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/204
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.