NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: in support of the BfR position

Frank A. Barile; Sir Colin Berry; Bas Blaauboer; Alan Boobis; Herrmann M. Bolt; Christopher Borgert; Wolfgang Dekant; Daniel Dietrich; Jose L. Domingo; Corrado L. Galli; Gio Batta Gori; Helmut Greim; Jan G. Hengstler; Pat Heslop-Harrison; Sam Kacew; Hans Marquardt; Angela Mally; Olavi Pelkonen; Kai Savolainen; Emanuela Testai; Aristides Tsatsakis; Nico P. Vermeulen
Archives of Toxicology · Vol. 95, Issue 9 · pp. 3133-3136 · 2021

Abstract

The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) asserts that both human health and the environment are presently threatened and that further regulation is necessary. In a recent Guest Editorial, members of the German competent authority for risk assessment, the BfR, raised concerns about the scientific justification for this strategy. The complexity and interdependence of the networks of regulation of chemical substances have ensured that public health and wellbeing in the EU have continuously improved. A continuous process of improvement in consumer protection is clearly desirable but any initiative directed towards this objective must be based on scientific knowledge. It must not confound risk with other factors in determining policy. This conclusion is fully supported in the present Commentary including the request to improve both, data collection and the time-consuming and bureaucratic procedures that delay the publication of regulations.

Bibliographic Information

JournalArchives of Toxicology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2021-09-01
Publication Year2021
Volume95
Issue9
Pages3133-3136
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0340-5761
eISSN1432-0738
DOI10.1007/s00204-021-03125-w

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1930-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/204
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.