NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Feed‐based common carp farming and eutrophication: is there a reason for concern?

Koushik Roy; Jaroslav Vrba; Sadasivam J. Kaushik; Jan Mraz
Reviews in Aquaculture · Vol. 12, Issue 3 · pp. 1736-1758 · 2020

Abstract

Metadata from 70 research articles on Cyprinus carpio digestibility published between 1973 and 2017, covering 71 feed ingredients, were analysed. Interquartile range (IR) of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content in feedstuffs was 5–8% and 0.7–1.2% of dry matter, respectively, with digestible N:P 7.2:1–44.1:1. IR of N digestibility (79–99%) was high, whereas IR of P digestibility (27–47%) was rather poor. Dietary energy digestibility (gross energy and non‐protein energy) was >76%. Higher P in feedstuffs caused significant negative interferences for N digestibility. IR of nutrient content in carp faeces was estimated at 0.5–1.7% N and 0.4–0.9% P. Considering the metabolic losses, the carp excreta have an ‘eutrophic’ N:P ratio (2.1:1–5.8:1). Eutrophication potential from feeding seems linked to P digestibility followed by bad protein profile of diets. While brewery wastes, microbial protein and natural prey offer high P digestibility (75–90%), large knowledge gaps still exist in P digestibility of various ingredients. Thermal processing does not always improve P digestibility; acidic pre‐incubation with phytases (optimum: 1500–2000 IU kg −1 feed) is worth exploring. Under semi‐intensive system, digestible ‘supplementary’ nutrients (N: 3.3–4.9%, P: 0.2–0.5%; even lower) can support at least 0.6–1.2 thermal growth coefficient (reasonable growth) and be ecologically relevant. We further considered validity of data within experimental conditions; effects on N/P utilization; non‐faecal losses (IRs 17–59% of N intake; 9–18% of P intake); and controversies over eutrophication. Recent eutrophication of carp fishponds might have been rather ‘management‐driven’ than carp's biological limitations. Ameliorative measures are outlined.

Bibliographic Information

JournalReviews in Aquaculture
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2020-08-01
Publication Year2020
Volume12
Issue3
Pages1736-1758
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1753-5123
eISSN1753-5131
DOI10.1111/raq.12407
SubjectGeneral Aquaculture, Fisheries & Fish Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2009-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/17535131
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.