NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Rice responses to drought under carbon dioxide enrichment. 2. Photosynthesis and evapotranspiration

JEFFREY BAKER; L. HARTWELL ALLEN; KENNETH BOOTE; NIGEL PICKERING
Global Change Biology · Vol. 3, Issue 2 · pp. 129-138 · 1997

Abstract

Future climate change is projected to include a strong likelihood of continued increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO 2 ]) and possible shifts in precipitation patterns. Due mainly to uncertainties in the timing and amounts of monsoonal rainfall, drought is common in rainfed rice production systems. The objectives of this study were to quantify the effects and possible interactions of [CO 2 ] and drought stress on rice ( Oryza sativa , L.) photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and water‐use efficiency. Rice (cv. IR‐72) was grown to maturity in eight naturally sunlit, plant growth chambers in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations [CO 2 ] of 350 and 700 μmol CO 2 mol –1 air. In both [CO 2 ], water management treatments included continuously flooded controls, flood water removed and drought stress imposed at panicle initiation, anthesis, and both panicle initiation and anthesis. Potential acclimation of rice photosynthesis to long‐term [CO 2 ] growth treatments of 350 and 700 μmol mol –1 was tested by comparing canopy photosynthesis rates across short‐term [CO 2 ] ranging from 160 to 1000 μmol mol –1 . These tests showed essentially no acclimation response with photosynthetic rate being a function of current short‐term [CO 2 ] rather than long‐term [CO 2 ] growth treatment. In both long‐term [CO 2 ] treatments, photosynthetic rate saturated with respect to [CO 2 ] near 510 μmol mol –1 . Carbon dioxide enrichment significantly increased both canopy net photosynthetic rate (21–27%) and water‐use efficiency while reducing evapotranspiration by about 10%. This water saving under [CO 2 ] enrichment allowed photosynthesis to continue for about one to two days longer during drought in the enriched compared with the ambient [CO 2 ] control treatments.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date1997-04-01
Publication Year1997
Volume3
Issue2
Pages129-138
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1046/j.1365-2486.1997.00061.x
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.