NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

The photosynthesis – leaf nitrogen relationship at ambient and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide: a meta‐analysis

Andrew G. Peterson; J. Timothy Ball; YiqI. Luo; Christopher B. Field; Peter B. Reich; Peter S. Curtis; Kevin L. Griffin; Carla A. Gunderson; Richard J. Norby; David T. Tissue; Manfred Forstreuter; AnA. Rey; Christoph S. Vogel; Cmeal Participants
Global Change Biology · Vol. 5, Issue 3 · pp. 331-346 · 1999

Abstract

Estimation of leaf photosynthetic rate ( A ) from leaf nitrogen content ( N ) is both conceptually and numerically important in models of plant, ecosystem, and biosphere responses to global change. The relationship between A and N has been studied extensively at ambient CO 2 but much less at elevated CO 2 . This study was designed to (i) assess whether the A–N relationship was more similar for species within than between community and vegetation types, and (ii) examine how growth at elevated CO 2 affects the A–N relationship. Data were obtained for 39 C3 species grown at ambient CO 2 and 10 C3 species grown at ambient and elevated CO 2 . A regression model was applied to each species as well as to species pooled within different community and vegetation types. Cluster analysis of the regression coefficients indicated that species measured at ambient CO 2 did not separate into distinct groups matching community or vegetation type. Instead, most community and vegetation types shared the same general parameter space for regression coefficients. Growth at elevated CO 2 increased photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency for pines and deciduous trees. When species were pooled by vegetation type, the A–N relationship for deciduous trees expressed on a leaf‐mass basis was not altered by elevated CO 2 , while the intercept increased for pines. When regression coefficients were averaged to give mean responses for different vegetation types, elevated CO 2 increased the intercept and the slope for deciduous trees but increased only the intercept for pines. There were no statistical differences between the pines and deciduous trees for the effect of CO 2 . Generalizations about the effect of elevated CO 2 on the A–N relationship, and differences between pines and deciduous trees will be enhanced as more data become available.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date1999-03-01
Publication Year1999
Volume5
Issue3
Pages331-346
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00234.x
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.