NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Role of vegetation in determining carbon sequestration along ecological succession in the southeastern United States

PAUL C. STOY; GABRIEL G. KATUL; MARIO B. S. SIQUEIRA; JEHN‐YIH JUANG; KIMBERLY A. NOVICK; HEATHER R. McCARTHY; A. CHRISTOPHER OISHI; RAM OREN
Global Change Biology · Vol. 14, Issue 6 · pp. 1409-1427 · 2008

Abstract

Vegetation plays a central role in controlling terrestrial carbon (C) exchange, but quantifying its impacts on C cycling on time scales of ecological succession is hindered by a lack of long‐term observations. The net ecosystem exchange of carbon (NEE) was measured for several years in adjacent ecosystems that represent distinct phases of ecological succession in the southeastern USA. The experiment was designed to isolate the role of vegetation – apart from climate and soils – in controlling biosphere–atmosphere fluxes of CO 2 and water vapor. NEE was near zero over 5 years at an early successional old‐field ecosystem (OF). However, mean annual NEE was nearly equal, approximately −450 g C m −2 yr −1 , at an early successional planted pine forest (PP) and a late successional hardwood forest (HW) due to the sensitivity of the former to drought and ice storm damage. We hypothesize that these observations can be explained by the relationships between gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (RE) and canopy conductance, and long‐term shifts in ecosystem physiology in response to climate to maintain near‐constant ecosystem‐level water‐use efficiency (EWUE). Data support our hypotheses, but future research should examine if GEP and RE are causally related or merely controlled by similar drivers. At successional time scales, GEP and RE observations generally followed predictions from E. P. Odum's ‘Strategy of Ecosystem Development’, with the surprising exception that the relationship between GEP and RE resulted in large NEE at the late successional HW. A practical consequence of this research suggests that plantation forestry may confer no net benefit over the conservation of mature forests for C sequestration.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2008-06-01
Publication Year2008
Volume14
Issue6
Pages1409-1427
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01587.x
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.