NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Disturbance, rainfall and contrasting species responses mediated aboveground biomass response to 11 years of CO 2 enrichment in a Florida scrub‐oak ecosystem

TROY J. SEILER; DANIEL P. RASSE; JIAHONG LI; PAUL DIJKSTRA; HANS P. ANDERSON; DAVID P. JOHNSON; THOMAS L. POWELL; BRUCE A. HUNGATE; C. ROSS HINKLE; BERT G. DRAKE
Global Change Biology · Vol. 15, Issue 2 · pp. 356-367 · 2009

Abstract

This study reports the aboveground biomass response of a fire‐regenerated Florida scrub‐oak ecosystem exposed to elevated CO 2 (1996–2007), from emergence after fire through canopy closure. Eleven years exposure to elevated CO 2 caused a 67% increase in aboveground shoot biomass. Growth stimulation was sustained throughout the experiment; although there was significant variability between years. The absolute stimulation of aboveground biomass generally declined over time, reflecting increasing environmental limitations to long‐term growth response. Extensive defoliation caused by hurricanes in September 2004 was followed by a strong increase in shoot density in 2005 that may have resulted from reopening the canopy and relocating nitrogen from leaves to the nutrient‐poor soil. Biomass response to elevated CO 2 was driven primarily by stimulation of growth of the dominant species, Quercus myrtifolia , while Quercus geminata , the other co‐dominant oak, displayed no significant CO 2 response. Aboveground growth also displayed interannual variation, which was correlated with total annual rainfall. The rainfall × CO 2 interaction was partially masked at the community level by species‐specific responses: elevated CO 2 had an ameliorating effect on Q. myrtifolia growth under water stress. The results of this long‐term study not only show that atmospheric CO 2 concentration had a consistent stimulating effect on aboveground biomass production, but also showed that available water is the primary driver of interannual variation in shoot growth and that the long‐term response to elevated CO 2 may have been caused by other factors such as nutrient limitation and disturbance.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2009-02-01
Publication Year2009
Volume15
Issue2
Pages356-367
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01740.x
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.