NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

A synthesis of methane emissions from 71 northern, temperate, and subtropical wetlands

Merritt R. Turetsky; Agnieszka Kotowska; Jill Bubier; Nancy B. Dise; Patrick Crill; Ed R. C. Hornibrook; Kari Minkkinen; Tim R. Moore; Isla H. Myers‐Smith; Hannu Nykänen; David Olefeldt; Janne Rinne; Sanna Saarnio; Narasinha Shurpali; Eeva‐Stiina Tuittila; J. Michael Waddington; Jeffrey R. White; Kimberly P. Wickland; Martin Wilmking
Global Change Biology · Vol. 20, Issue 7 · pp. 2183-2197 · 2014

Abstract

Wetlands are the largest natural source of atmospheric methane. Here, we assess controls on methane flux using a database of approximately 19 000 instantaneous measurements from 71 wetland sites located across subtropical, temperate, and northern high latitude regions. Our analyses confirm general controls on wetland methane emissions from soil temperature, water table, and vegetation, but also show that these relationships are modified depending on wetland type (bog, fen, or swamp), region (subarctic to temperate), and disturbance. Fen methane flux was more sensitive to vegetation and less sensitive to temperature than bog or swamp fluxes. The optimal water table for methane flux was consistently below the peat surface in bogs, close to the peat surface in poor fens, and above the peat surface in rich fens. However, the largest flux in bogs occurred when dry 30‐day averaged antecedent conditions were followed by wet conditions, while in fens and swamps, the largest flux occurred when both 30‐day averaged antecedent and current conditions were wet. Drained wetlands exhibited distinct characteristics, e.g. the absence of large flux following wet and warm conditions, suggesting that the same functional relationships between methane flux and environmental conditions cannot be used across pristine and disturbed wetlands. Together, our results suggest that water table and temperature are dominant controls on methane flux in pristine bogs and swamps, while other processes, such as vascular transport in pristine fens, have the potential to partially override the effect of these controls in other wetland types. Because wetland types vary in methane emissions and have distinct controls, these ecosystems need to be considered separately to yield reliable estimates of global wetland methane release.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2014-07-01
Publication Year2014
Volume20
Issue7
Pages2183-2197
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1111/gcb.12580
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.