NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Using models to guide field experiments: a priori predictions for the CO 2 response of a nutrient‐ and water‐limited native Eucalypt woodland

Belinda E. Medlyn; Martin G. De Kauwe; Sönke Zaehle; Anthony P. Walker; Remko A. Duursma; Kristina Luus; Mikhail Mishurov; Bernard Pak; Benjamin Smith; Ying‐Ping Wang; Xiaojuan Yang; Kristine Y. Crous; John E. Drake; Teresa E. Gimeno; Catriona A. Macdonald; Richard J. Norby; Sally A. Power; Mark G. Tjoelker; David S. Ellsworth
Global Change Biology · Vol. 22, Issue 8 · pp. 2834-2851 · 2016

Abstract

The response of terrestrial ecosystems to rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration (C a ), particularly under nutrient‐limited conditions, is a major uncertainty in Earth System models. The Eucalyptus Free‐Air CO 2 Enrichment (Euc FACE ) experiment, recently established in a nutrient‐ and water‐limited woodland presents a unique opportunity to address this uncertainty, but can best do so if key model uncertainties have been identified in advance. We applied seven vegetation models, which have previously been comprehensively assessed against earlier forest FACE experiments, to simulate a priori possible outcomes from Euc FACE . Our goals were to provide quantitative projections against which to evaluate data as they are collected, and to identify key measurements that should be made in the experiment to allow discrimination among alternative model assumptions in a postexperiment model intercomparison. Simulated responses of annual net primary productivity ( NPP ) to elevated C a ranged from 0.5 to 25% across models. The simulated reduction of NPP during a low‐rainfall year also varied widely, from 24 to 70%. Key processes where assumptions caused disagreement among models included nutrient limitations to growth; feedbacks to nutrient uptake; autotrophic respiration; and the impact of low soil moisture availability on plant processes. Knowledge of the causes of variation among models is now guiding data collection in the experiment, with the expectation that the experimental data can optimally inform future model improvements.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2016-08-01
Publication Year2016
Volume22
Issue8
Pages2834-2851
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1111/gcb.13268
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.