NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Temporal response of soil organic carbon after grassland‐related land‐use change

Wei Li; Philippe Ciais; Bertrand Guenet; Shushi Peng; Jinfeng Chang; Vincent Chaplot; Sergey Khudyaev; Anna Peregon; Shilong Piao; Yilong Wang; Chao Yue
Global Change Biology · Vol. 24, Issue 10 · pp. 4731-4746 · 2018

Abstract

The net flux of CO 2 exchanged with the atmosphere following grassland‐related land‐use change ( LUC ) depends on the subsequent temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon ( SOC ). Yet, the magnitude and timing of these dynamics are still unclear. We compiled a global data set of 836 paired‐sites to quantify temporal SOC changes after grassland‐related LUC . In order to discriminate between SOC losses from the initial ecosystem and gains from the secondary one, the post‐ LUC time series of SOC data was combined with satellite‐based net primary production observations as a proxy of carbon input to the soil. Globally, land conversion from either cropland or forest into grassland leads to SOC accumulation; the reverse shows net SOC loss. The SOC response curves vary between different regions. Conversion of cropland to managed grassland results in more SOC accumulation than natural grassland recovery from abandoned cropland. We did not consider the biophysical variables (e.g., climate conditions and soil properties) when fitting the SOC turnover rate into the observation data but analyzed the relationships between the fitted turnover rate and these variables. The SOC turnover rate is significantly correlated with temperature and precipitation ( p p > 0.05). Comparing our results with predictions from bookkeeping models, we found that bookkeeping models overestimate by 56% of the long‐term (100 years horizon) cumulative SOC emissions for grassland‐related LUC types in tropical and temperate regions since 2000. We also tested the spatial representativeness of our data set and calculated SOC response curves using the representative subset of sites in each region. Our study provides new insight into the impact grassland‐related LUC on the global carbon budget and sheds light on the potential of grassland conservation for climate mitigation.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2018-10-01
Publication Year2018
Volume24
Issue10
Pages4731-4746
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1111/gcb.14328
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.