NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Fluvial CO 2 and CH 4 patterns across wildfire‐disturbed ecozones of subarctic Canada: Current status and implications for future change

Ryan H. S. Hutchins; Suzanne E. Tank; David Olefeldt; William L. Quinton; Christopher Spence; Nicole Dion; Cristian Estop‐Aragonés; Samson G. Mengistu
Global Change Biology · Vol. 26, Issue 4 · pp. 2304-2319 · 2020

Abstract

Despite occupying a small fraction of the landscape, fluvial networks are disproportionately large emitters of CO 2 and CH 4 , with the potential to offset terrestrial carbon sinks. Yet the extent of this offset remains uncertain, because current estimates of fluvial emissions often do not integrate beyond individual river reaches and over the entire fluvial network in complex landscapes. Here we studied broad patterns of concentrations and isotopic signatures of CO 2 and CH 4 in 50 streams in the western boreal biome of Canada, across an area of 250,000 km 2 . Our study watersheds differ starkly in their geology (sedimentary and shield), permafrost extent (sporadic to extensive discontinuous) and land cover (large variability in lake and wetland extents). We also investigated the effect of wildfire, as half of our study streams drained watersheds affected by megafires that occurred 3 years prior. Similar to other boreal regions, we found that stream CO 2 concentrations were primarily associated with greater terrestrial productivity and warmer climates, and decreased downstream within the fluvial network. No effects of recent wildfire, bedrock geology or land cover composition were found. The isotopic signatures suggested dominance of biogenic CO 2 sources, despite dominant carbonate bedrock in parts of the study region. Fluvial CH 4 concentrations had a high variability which could not be explained by any landscape factors. Estimated fluvial CO 2 emissions were 0.63 (0.09–6.06, 95% CI) and 0.29 (0.17–0.44, 95% CI) g C m −2 year −1 at the landscape scale using a stream network modelling and a mass balance approach, respectively, a small but potentially important component of the landscape C balance. These fluvial CO 2 emissions are lower than in other northern regions, likely due to a drier climate. Overall, our study suggests that fluvial CO 2 emissions are unlikely to be sensitive to altered fire regimes, but that warming and permafrost thaw will increase emissions significantly.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2020-04-01
Publication Year2020
Volume26
Issue4
Pages2304-2319
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1111/gcb.14960
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.