Journal Article
The CO 2 record at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory: A new opportunity to study processes on seasonal and inter‐annual scales
Santiago Botía; Shujiro Komiya; Julia Marshall; Thomas Koch; Michał Gałkowski; Jost Lavric; Eliane Gomes‐Alves; David Walter; Gilberto Fisch; Davieliton M. Pinho; Bruce W. Nelson; Giordane Martins; Ingrid T. Luijkx; Gerbrand Koren; Liesbeth Florentie; Alessandro Carioca de Araújo; Marta Sá; Meinrat O. Andreae; Martin Heimann; Wouter Peters; Christoph Gerbig
Global Change Biology · Vol. 28, Issue 2 · pp. 588-611 · 2022
Abstract
High‐quality atmospheric CO 2 measurements are sparse in Amazonia, but can provide critical insights into the spatial and temporal variability of sources and sinks of CO 2 . In this study, we present the first 6 years (2014–2019) of continuous, high‐precision measurements of atmospheric CO 2 at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO, 2.1°S, 58.9°W). After subtracting the simulated background concentrations from our observational record, we define a CO 2 regional signal ( ) that has a marked seasonal cycle with an amplitude of about 4 ppm. At both seasonal and inter‐annual scales, we find differences in phase between and the local eddy covariance net ecosystem exchange (EC‐NEE), which is interpreted as an indicator of a decoupling between local and non‐local drivers of . In addition, we present how the 2015–2016 El Niño‐induced drought was captured by our atmospheric record as a positive 2σ anomaly in both the wet and dry season of 2016. Furthermore, we analyzed the observed seasonal cycle and inter‐annual variability of together with net ecosystem exchange (NEE) using a suite of modeled flux products representing biospheric and aquatic CO 2 exchange. We use both non‐optimized and optimized (i.e., resulting from atmospheric inverse modeling) NEE fluxes as input in an atmospheric transport model (STILT). The observed shape and amplitude of the seasonal cycle was captured neither by the simulations using the optimized fluxes nor by those using the diagnostic Vegetation and Photosynthesis Respiration Model (VPRM). We show that including the contribution of CO 2 from river evasion improves the simulated shape (not the magnitude) of the seasonal cycle when using a data‐driven non‐optimized NEE product (FLUXCOM). The simulated contribution from river evasion was found to be 25% of the seasonal cycle amplitude. Our study demonstrates the importance of the ATTO record to better understand the Amazon carbon cycle at various spatial and temporal scales.