NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Realistic rates of nitrogen addition increase carbon flux rates but do not change soil carbon stocks in a temperate grassland

Megan E. Wilcots; Katie M. Schroeder; Lang C. DeLancey; Savannah J. Kjaer; Sarah E. Hobbie; Eric W. Seabloom; Elizabeth T. Borer
Global Change Biology · Vol. 28, Issue 16 · pp. 4819-4831 · 2022

Abstract

Changes in the biosphere carbon (C) sink are of utmost importance given rising atmospheric CO 2 levels. Concurrent global changes, such as increasing nitrogen (N) deposition, are affecting how much C can be stored in terrestrial ecosystems. Understanding the extent of these impacts will help in predicting the fate of the biosphere C sink. However, most N addition experiments add N in rates that greatly exceed ambient rates of N deposition, making inference from current knowledge difficult. Here, we leveraged data from a 13‐year N addition gradient experiment with addition rates spanning realistic rates of N deposition (0, 1, 5, and 10 g N m −2 year −1 ) to assess the rates of N addition at which C uptake and storage were stimulated in a temperate grassland. Very low rates of N addition stimulated gross primary productivity and plant biomass, but also stimulated ecosystem respiration such that there was no net change in C uptake or storage. Furthermore, we found consistent, nonlinear relationships between N addition rate and plant responses such that intermediate rates of N addition induced the greatest ecosystem responses. Soil pH and microbial biomass and respiration all declined with increasing N addition indicating that negative consequences of N addition have direct effects on belowground processes, which could then affect whole ecosystem C uptake and storage. Our work demonstrates that experiments that add large amounts of N may be underestimating the effect of low to intermediate rates of N deposition on grassland C cycling. Furthermore, we show that plant biomass does not reliably indicate rates of C uptake or soil C storage, and that measuring rates of C loss (i.e., ecosystem and soil respiration) in conjunction with rates of C uptake and C pools are crucial for accurately understanding grassland C storage.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2022-08-01
Publication Year2022
Volume28
Issue16
Pages4819-4831
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1111/gcb.16272
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.