NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Fully Mechanized Cut-to-Length (CTL) Harvesting Operations of Industrial Roundwood: A Review

Kalle Kärhä; Lars Eliasson; Martin Kühmaier; Raffaele Spinelli
Current Forestry Reports · Vol. 10, Issue 4 · pp. 255-272 · 2024

Abstract

Purpose of Review The aim of this literature review was to bring together the most relevant and recent research information on the fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions caused by the fully mechanized cut-to-length (CTL) harvesting machinery when applied to industrial roundwood. A specific aim of this review was to describe the effect of different independent variables on fuel consumption in fully mechanized CTL wood-harvesting operations. Recent Findings The review showed that the engine power of CTL forest machines accounts for most of the variance in the hourly fuel consumption of both harvesters and forwarders. We underline that the cubic-metre-based fuel consumption of CTL forest machines is correlated to the same factors that affect work productivity. Among all influencing factors, the average stem size, removal intensity and silvicultural treatment have the strongest effect on the fuel consumption per m 3 incurred with felling-processing, whereas forwarding distance, removal intensity and payload size are the main drivers of fuel consumption per m 3 as incurred with extraction. Further influencing factors are soil type (mineral soil or peatland), use of tracks, assortment type and machine size. Together with those factors, the role of the machine operator remains crucial and is dependent on two separate skills: the capacity to achieve high productivity, and that to apply fuel-saving driving techniques. Summary The easiest way to reduce the carbon footprint of CTL harvesting machines is to increase the productivity of the harvesting work, for example by giving machine operator-specific training to utilize more efficient work methods and economic energy-efficient driving techniques. Furthermore, several other measures to reduce the carbon footprint of CTL harvesting operations were discussed in this review. Finally, we recommend that all essential variables that have a significant impact on the productivity of harvesting work, fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions are reported in study papers in the future.

Bibliographic Information

JournalCurrent Forestry Reports
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2024-05-14
Publication Year2024
Volume10
Issue4
Pages255-272
Document TypeJournal Article
eISSN2198-6436
DOI10.1007/s40725-024-00219-3

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2015-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/40725
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.