NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Tree Harvest Decisions Modulate the Climate Impact of Rewetting in a Low‐Productive Peatland Forest in Boreal Sweden

Järvi Järveoja; Alexander Pinkwart; Cheuk Hei Marcus Tong; Eduardo Martínez‐García; Hjalmar Laudon; Matthias Peichl; Mats B. Nilsson
Global Change Biology · Vol. 32, Issue 6 · 2026

Abstract

Over the past century, extensive areas of northern peatlands have been drained for forestry. Today, concerns about their role as significant sources of greenhouse gases (GHG) have sparked growing interest in peatland rewetting as a climate mitigating strategy. However, empirical evidence for rewetting effects on ecosystem carbon (C) and GHG balances is still limited, particularly for minerogenic boreal peatland forests. Rewetting of peatland forests also involves decisions about tree harvest, which can have important but understudied consequences for the C cycle. In this study, we quantified tree growth and estimated carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) fluxes in both peatland areas and ditches over 2 years before (2019–2020) and after (2021–2022) rewetting a low‐productive, minerogenic peatland forest in boreal Sweden. We also assessed effects of tree removal during rewetting by comparing harvest and non‐harvest areas. Our results suggest that the peatland forest was, on average, C‐neutral at the ecosystem‐scale during the drained years. After rewetting, the harvested area became a C source (79 g C m −2 year −1 ), while the treed area acted as a small C sink (−24 g C m −2 year −1 ), with the difference due to diverging responses in net CO 2 exchange. Furthermore, CH 4 emissions doubled after rewetting, resulting in a two‐ to threefold increase in total GHG emissions (expressed in CO 2 equivalents) over both 20‐ and 100‐year timeframes. While ditches functioned as significant CO 2 sinks and moderate CH 4 sources during the drained years, they became CO 2 ‐neutral and CH 4 emission hotspots after being infilled. Altogether, our findings suggest that rewetting low‐productive boreal peatland forests may have a negative short‐term climate impact. However, rewetting without tree harvest considerably meliorates ecosystem C and GHG balances. Overall, our study highlights the importance of tree harvesting decisions and the need for a deeper understanding of rewetting as a climate mitigation strategy.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Change Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2026-06-01
Publication Year2026
Volume32
Issue6
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1354-1013
eISSN1365-2486
DOI10.1111/gcb.70946
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/13652486
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.