NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Empirical evidence for the scale dependence of biotic interactions

Jonathan Belmaker; Phoebe Zarnetske; Mao‐Ning Tuanmu; Sara Zonneveld; Sydne Record; Angela Strecker; Lydia Beaudrot
Global Ecology and Biogeography · Vol. 24, Issue 7 · pp. 750-761 · 2015

Abstract

Aim Although it is recognized that ecological patterns are scale dependent, the exact scales over which specific ecological processes operate are still a matter of controversy. In particular, understanding the scales over which biotic interactions operate is critical for predicting changes in species distributions in the face of the ongoing biodiversity crisis. It has been hypothesized that biotic interactions operate predominately at fine grains, yet this conjecture has received relatively little empirical scrutiny. We use US woodpeckers as a model system to assess the relative importance of biotic interactions, environmental suitability and geographic proximity to other intraspecific occurrence sites, across scales. Location Conterminous U nited S tates. Methods We combined species occurrence data from the N orth A merican B reeding B ird S urvey ( BBS ) with a large pair‐wise interaction matrix describing known interactions among woodpeckers and other bird species. Using a logistic mixed modelling framework we then established the relative importance of biotic interactions as predictors of woodpecker occurrences in relation to environment and geographic proximity to intraspecific occurrence sites. Results We found that geographic proximity becomes a stronger predictor of woodpecker occurrence as grain becomes coarser, while environment is grain‐invariant. As opposed to environment and geographic proximity, we found that when the focal species experienced positive biotic interactions, the importance of interactions decreased with increased grain. However, positive interactions remained important up to a grain size of entire BBS routes ( c . 40 km), which is much coarser than the grain size used by most species distribution models. In contrast, when the focal species experienced negative interactions we did not find clear grain dependence. Main conclusions Biotic interactions (both positive and negative) are important predictors of species occurrences. While these interactions are strongest at fine grains, they can remain important even at coarse grains, and are thus critical for predicting distributional changes in the face of the ongoing biodiversity crisis.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2015-07-01
Publication Year2015
Volume24
Issue7
Pages750-761
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1466-822X
eISSN1466-8238
DOI10.1111/geb.12311
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1998-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/14668238
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.