NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Cities are hotspots for threatened species

Christopher D. Ives; Pia E. Lentini; Caragh G. Threlfall; Karen Ikin; Danielle F. Shanahan; Georgia E. Garrard; Sarah A. Bekessy; Richard A. Fuller; Laura Mumaw; Laura Rayner; Ross Rowe; Leonie E. Valentine; Dave Kendal
Global Ecology and Biogeography · Vol. 25, Issue 1 · pp. 117-126 · 2016

Abstract

Aim Although urbanization impacts many species, there is little information on the patterns of occurrences of threatened species in urban relative to non‐urban areas. By assessing the extent of the distribution of threatened species across all A ustralian cities, we aim to investigate the currently under‐utilized opportunity that cities present for national biodiversity conservation. Location A ustralian mainland, T asmania and offshore islands. Methods Distributions of A ustralia's 1643 legally protected terrestrial species (hereafter ‘threatened species’) were compiled. We assessed the extent to which they overlapped with 99 cities (of more than 10,000 people), with all non‐urban areas, and with simulated ‘dummy’ cities which covered the same area and bioregion as the true cities but were non‐urban. We analysed differences between animals and plants, and examined variability within these groups using species accumulation modelling. Threatened species richness of true versus dummy cities was analysed using generalized linear mixed‐effects models. Results A ustralian cities support substantially more nationally threatened animal and plant species than all other non‐urban areas on a unit‐area basis. Thirty per cent of threatened species were found to occur in cities. Distribution patterns differed between plants and animals: individual threatened plant species were generally found in fewer cities than threatened animal species, yet plants were more likely to have a greater proportion of their distribution in urban areas than animals. Individual cities tended to contain unique suites of threatened species, especially threatened plants. The analysis of true versus dummy cities demonstrated that, even after accounting for factors such as net primary productivity and distance to the coast, cities still consistently supported a greater number of threatened species. Main conclusions This research highlights that A ustralian cities are important for the conservation of threatened species, and that the species assemblages of individual cities are relatively distinct. National conservation policy should recognize that cities play an integral role when planning for and managing threatened species.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2016-01-01
Publication Year2016
Volume25
Issue1
Pages117-126
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1466-822X
eISSN1466-8238
DOI10.1111/geb.12404
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1998-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/14668238
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.