The proposed APHIS regulation modernization could enhance agriculture biotechnology research and development in the USA

Abstract

The USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is one of three agencies that govern the importation, interstate movement, or environmental release of certain genetically engineered (GE) organisms. APHIS regulations are in 7 CFR part 340, originally issued in 1987 ( https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/7_cfr_340.pdf ) and based on the premise that a GE crop could pose a plant pest risk. A major revision was proposed June 6, 2019 ( https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20190606.pdf ), with public comments accepted for 60 d. Members of the Society for In Vitro Biology (SIVB)—especially within the plant section—are impacted by the current rules and will be impacted by changes. Therefore, the public policy committee studied the changes and prepared a response that was reviewed by the board of directors and submitted to APHIS. APHIS received 6186 comments overall. In general, the SIVB welcomes the proposed revisions, which recognize established scientific guidelines and principles for plant pest risk assessment. In addition, they recognize the safety record accumulated over multiple decades of current GE mechanisms of action (MOA), so the proposed rules include an exemption for new events with established MOA’s in a previously reviewed crop. Further, the proposed rules focus on DNA function and impact rather than its source organism with regulatory review triggered by potential for increased plant pest risk. Most importantly, the proposed revisions codify a light regulatory approach for many applications of genome editing, because these applications result in plants that could otherwise have been developed through traditional breeding techniques or found in nature. If implemented appropriately in the final rule, we find these changes remove many current barriers, and thus are likely to stimulate university and business “startup” innovation. The SIVB recognizes the need for exemption for further model species and gene delivery organisms. Such concerns were adequately expressed by the submitted response. Remaining hurdles for innovative plant incorporated protectants are still problematic. Nevertheless, the SIVB applauds the efforts to update APHIS rules in a scientifically defensible manner. The detailed response is shared below.

Bibliographic Information