Journal Article
Chemical and Electrophysiological Characterisation of Headspace Volatiles from Yeasts Attractive to Drosophila suzukii
Irene Castellan; Claire Duménil; Guillermo Rehermann; Daniela Eisenstecken; Flavia Bianchi; Peter Robatscher; Urban Spitaler; Riccardo Favaro; Silvia Schmidt; Paul G. Becher; Sergio Angeli
Journal of Chemical Ecology · Vol. 50, Issue 11 · pp. 830-846 · 2024
Abstract
Chemical control of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) based on the use of insecticides is particularly challenging as the insect attacks ripening fruits shortly before harvest. An alternative strategy may rely on the use of yeasts as phagostimulants and baits, applied on canopy as attract-and-kill formulations. The aim of this research was to identify the most attractive among six yeast species for D. suzukii : Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Hanseniaspora uvarum , Clavispora santaluciae , Saccharomycopsis vini , Issatchenkia terricola , and Metschnikowia pulcherrima . The volatile profile of C . santaluciae was described for the first time. Behavioural experiments identified H. uvarum and S. vini as the most attractive yeasts. The characterization of yeast headspace volatiles using direct headspace (DHS) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) revealed several strain-specific compounds. With DHS injection, 19 volatiles were characterised, while SPME revealed 71 compounds constituting the yeast headspace. Both analyses revealed terpenoids including β-ocimene, citronellol, ( Z )-geraniol (nerol), and geranial as distinct constituents of S. vini . H. uvarum and S. vini were further investigated using closed-loop stripping analysis (CSLA) and electroantennography. Out of 14 compounds quantified by CSLA, ethyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, β-myrcene, benzaldehyde and linalool were detected by D. suzukii antennae and might generate the strong attractiveness of S. vini and H. uvarum. Our results highlight a strong attraction of D. suzukii to various yeasts associated with both the flies and their habitat and demonstrate how different sampling methods can impact the results of volatile compound characterization. It remains to be demonstrated whether the distinct attraction is based on special adaptations to certain yeasts and to what extent the metabolites causing attraction are interchangeable.