NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Global patterns of body size evolution in squamate reptiles are not driven by climate

Alex Slavenko; Anat Feldman; Allen Allison; Aaron M. Bauer; Monika Böhm; Laurent Chirio; Guarino R. Colli; Indraneil Das; Tiffany M. Doan; Matthew LeBreton; Marcio Martins; Danny Meirte; Zoltán T. Nagy; Cristiano de C. Nogueira; Olivier S. G. Pauwels; Daniel Pincheira‐Donoso; Uri Roll; Philipp Wagner; Yuezhao Wang; Shai Meiri
Global Ecology and Biogeography · Vol. 28, Issue 4 · pp. 471-483 · 2019

Abstract

Aim Variation in body size across animal species underlies most ecological and evolutionary processes shaping local‐ and large‐scale patterns of biodiversity. For well over a century, climatic factors have been regarded as primary sources of natural selection on animal body size, and hypotheses such as Bergmann's rule (the increase of body size with decreasing temperature) have dominated discussions. However, evidence for consistent climatic effects, especially among ectotherms, remains equivocal. Here, we test a range of key hypotheses on climate‐driven size evolution in squamate reptiles across several spatial and phylogenetic scales. Location Global. Time period Extant. Major taxa studied Squamates (lizards and snakes). Methods We quantified the role of temperature, precipitation, seasonality and net primary productivity as drivers of body mass across ca. 95% of extant squamate species (9,733 spp.). We ran spatial autoregressive models of phylogenetically corrected median mass per equal‐area grid cell. We ran models globally, across separate continents and for major squamate clades independently. We also performed species‐level analyses using phylogenetic generalized least square models and linear regressions of independent contrasts of sister species. Results Our analyses failed to identify consistent spatial patterns in body size as a function of our climatic predictors. Nearly all continent‐ and family‐level models differed from one another, and species‐level models had low explanatory power. Main conclusions The global distribution of body mass among living squamates varies independently from the variation in multiple components of climate. Our study, the largest in spatial and taxonomic scale conducted to date, reveals that there is little support for a universal, consistent mechanism of climate‐driven size evolution within squamates.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2019-04-01
Publication Year2019
Volume28
Issue4
Pages471-483
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1466-822X
eISSN1466-8238
DOI10.1111/geb.12868
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1998-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/14668238
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.