NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Antimicrobial residues in meat from chickens in Northeast Vietnam: analytical validation and pilot study for sampling optimisation

Sophie Hedges; Ludovic Pelligand; Liwei Chen; Kelyn Seow; Thuy Thi Hoang; Huong Quynh Luu; Son Thi Thanh Dang; Ngoc Thi Pham; Hoa Thi Thanh Pham; Yeong Cheng Cheah; Yulan Wang; Dominique Hurtaud-Pessel; Anne Conan; Guillaume Fournié; Damer Blake; Fiona Tomley; Patricia L. Conway
Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety · Vol. 19, Issue 2 · pp. 225-234 · 2024

Abstract

Antimicrobials used in chicken farming for therapeutic and/or prophylactic purposes may result in unacceptable levels of edible residues, if withdrawal periods are not respected. To evaluate the risk in Vietnam, we validated an analytical method to detect antimicrobial residues from chicken meat samples and carried out a pilot cross-sectional study to identify optimal sampling strategies. A total of 45 raw meat samples were collected from 4 markets, 1 slaughterhouse and 4 farms (5 per site) in Northern Vietnam, between March and April 2021. Farmers were asked about antimicrobials used during sampled production cycles (5 chickens sampled per batch). Samples were analysed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the presence of 68 antimicrobials at a pre-defined validation concentration. 7 compounds were identified from 4 classes (tetracyclines, sulphonamides, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones). In markets, where the source of sampled chickens was unknown, a diverse pool of residual antimicrobials was detected in 20% (4/20) of the meat samples. No residues were detected in samples from the slaughterhouse. No residues were detected in chickens from the one farm that reported using antimicrobials, whereas sulfadimethoxine, doxycycline and tilmicosin residues were identified from the other 3 farms reporting no antimicrobial use. The probability of detecting antimicrobial residues present in a flock based on sampling a single chicken was estimated at 0.93 (highest density interval 0.735–0.997). The preliminary results suggest a disparity between farmers’ reports on antimicrobial drug use and actual usage, and that the analysis of a single sample per farm has a high probability of detecting antimicrobial residues, if present.

Bibliographic Information

JournalJournal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2024-06-01
Publication Year2024
Volume19
Issue2
Pages225-234
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1661-5751
eISSN1661-5867
DOI10.1007/s00003-024-01478-9

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2006-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/3
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.