NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Physiological and behavioural responses of wandering albatross chicks (Diomedea exulans) to novel and non-novel predators

Anais Cotton; Christophe Barbraud; Sarah Leclaire; Karine Delord; Aymeric Bodin; Antoine Stier; Cécile Ribout; Charline Parenteau; Jean-Baptiste Ferdy; Charlotte Bourgoin; Joël White; Frédéric Angelier; Pierrick Blanchard
Journal of Comparative Physiology A · Vol. 212, Issue 3 · pp. 501-514 · 2026

Abstract

In long-standing predator-prey systems, prey typically evolve costly responses to predation risk. How prey respond to novel predators is less investigated. We explored physiological (corticosterone, triglyceride), morphological (body condition) and behavioural (defensive posture) responses of wandering albatross ( Diomedea exulans ) chicks to a novel predator, the feral cat ( Felis catus ) in Kerguelen archipelago. We implemented a semi-experimental design to increase the variance in cat abundance by regulating cat populations in certain zones of the study colony. The aforementioned chick traits were then monitored and analysed at the zone scale, by comparing nests located within regulated and non-regulated zones, and at the nest scale, by recording cat abundance through intensive camera traps monitoring. This fine-scale approach further enabled us to investigate how chicks responded to southern giant petrels ( Macronectes giganteus ), an opportunistic predator-scavenger that has co-evolved with albatrosses. Cat abundances had no effect on chick traits. In contrast, higher abundances of giant petrel were associated with an elevated rate of corticosterone increase and lower triglyceride levels. In accordance with these results suggesting a more accurate perception of predation risk mediated by giant petrels than by cats, chicks were more prone to display a defensive posture when facing a giant petrel than a cat. We discuss these results in the light of contrasting evolutionary histories and predation patterns between albatrosses and their predators, and we emphasise that studies of predator impacts on prey populations must consider both the direct and indirect effects of all predators, as well as their interactions.

Bibliographic Information

JournalJournal of Comparative Physiology A
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2026-05-01
Publication Year2026
Volume212
Issue3
Pages501-514
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0340-7594
eISSN1432-1351
DOI10.1007/s00359-026-01793-6

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1924-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/359
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.