NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Canopy Composition Outperforms Macroenvironment in Explaining European Forest Understory Composition

Jesús Sánchez‐Dávila; Jonathan Lenoir; Ewa Stefańska‐Krzaczek; Idoia Biurrun; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Juan Antonio Campos; Jens‐Christian Svenning; Gianmaria Bonari; Josep Padullés Cubino
Global Ecology and Biogeography · Vol. 34, Issue 7 · 2025

Abstract

Aim Diversity patterns in forest understories have traditionally been studied using macroclimatic variables. However, microenvironmental conditions below forest canopies are likely more relevant, though difficult to obtain. Species composition of the canopy layers can serve as a proxy for capturing microenvironmental conditions underneath trees and shrubs. In this study, we modelled the understory plant species (herbaceous and small woody species Time Period Present day. Location All forest types across Europe. Taxa Studied Vascular plants. Methods We compared the performance of a baseline model relying solely on macroenvironmental predictor variables against several canopy‐informed models incorporating three β‐diversity facets (taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic) of the canopy layers (i.e., the tree and shrub layer). We subsequently decomposed the explained deviance in the observed spatial variation in taxonomic composition of the understory layer between macroenvironmental conditions and all three facets of canopy‐derived metrics of β‐diversity. We finally compared and mapped spatial predictions in understory plant species composition between the baseline model and the best‐performing canopy‐informed model. Results Our canopy‐informed models that included β‐diversity metrics of canopy layers outperformed the baseline model based solely on macroenvironmental predictors. Beta‐diversity metrics relying on canopy species composition provided a greater explanatory power than macroenvironmental predictors. Specifically, the taxonomic β‐diversity of the shrub layer, followed by that of the tree layer, was the main variable driving the most performant canopy‐informed model. Maps of the predicted understory species composition indicated greater site heterogeneity when relying on canopy‐informed models than on the baseline model. Conclusions This work highlights how the inclusion of taxonomical species composition from the canopy layers can significantly improve the modelling of the understory plant species composition.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2025-07-01
Publication Year2025
Volume34
Issue7
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1466-822X
eISSN1466-8238
DOI10.1111/geb.70079
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1998-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/14668238
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.