NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Gaps in Global Alien Plant Trait Data and How to Fill Them

Matthias Grenié; Helge Bruelheide; Wayne Dawson; Franz Essl; Mark van Kleunen; Ingolf Kühn; Holger Kreft; Petr Pyšek; Patrick Weigelt; Marten Winter
Global Ecology and Biogeography · Vol. 34, Issue 10 · 2025

Abstract

Aim Functional traits help to understand the ecological processes underlying biological invasions. The extent to which trait data are available for alien plants at the global scale is unknown. In this study, we assess the availability of trait data and identify global gaps and biases. Location Global. Time Period Present. Major Taxa Studied Vascular plants. Methods We used the GloNAF database to get a global list of plants naturalised outside their native range and their distributions. We combined data from the four largest trait databases: AusTraits, BIEN, GIFT, and TRY, on which we performed taxonomic and trait harmonisation. We studied the availability of trait data. Then, based on the distribution data, we tested to what extent trait knowledge was driven by ecological and socioeconomic variables. Results We found that the species‐by‐trait matrix (2764 traits for 14,539 species) was only 1.5% complete, with most traits measured for very few species. Only ten traits were available for more than 50% of all alien plants. Four percent of the species lacked all trait data, while 27% of species had data for the three key plant traits: leaf mass per area, seed mass, and plant height. We observed a strong latitudinal gradient in trait knowledge, with tropical regions showing lower trait knowledge than higher latitudes, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere. Growth form, range size, and invasion status were the strongest predictors of trait knowledge, with widespread, invasive tree species being better recorded than other alien species. Main Conclusions We identified large trait data gaps at a global scale for alien plants, which limits our ability to study functional invasion ecology at large spatial scales. These gaps are partly driven by uneven sampling and a lack of trait data integration across sources. We recommend prioritising the most invasion‐relevant traits and coordinating community efforts of plant and invasion scientists to sample them in a standardised way, which could help close these gaps.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2025-10-01
Publication Year2025
Volume34
Issue10
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1466-822X
eISSN1466-8238
DOI10.1111/geb.70131
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1998-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/14668238
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.