NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Micro‐Refuges or Ecological Traps: Context‐Dependent Effects of Rock Pools on Intertidal Biodiversity Across Latitudes

Louise B. Firth; Andrea Desiderato; Antony M. Knights; J. David Aguirre; Juan C. Astudillo; Juan C. Azofeifa‐Solano; David T. Bilton; Su Yin Chee; Hartvig C. Christie; Ronaldo A. Christofoletti; Amelia Curd; Katherine A. Dafforn; Megan N. Dethier; Yun‐Wei Dong; Gabin Droual; Stanislas F. Dubois; Free Espinosa; Ally J. Evans; Andy Foggo; Stephen J. Hawkins; Mick E. Hanley; Ben P. Harvey; Eliza Heery; Seokwoo Hong; Amanda R. Hsiung; Tommy T. Y. Hui; Mar Humet; Katrin Iken; Soniya B. Jethva; Jeong Ha Kim; Koetsu Kon; Brenda Konar; Rahul S. Kundu; Jackson W. T. Lau; Kenneth M. Y. Leung; Xiao‐Xu Li; Yong‐Xu Sun; Fernando P. Lima; Ella Lis; Kiran Liversage; Lynette H. L. Loke; Aline S. Martinez; Mariana Mayer‐Pinto; Vanessa Mendonça; Christopher D. McQuaid; Pippa J. Moore; Rebecca L. Morris; Daudi Msangameno; Rocío Nieto‐Vilela; Barbara Ondiviela; Mauricio H. Oróstica; Enrique Ostalé‐Valriberas; Maria Gabriela Palomo; Eli Rinde; Rui Seabra; Jeffrey A. Sibaja‐Cordero; Ana Silva; Elisabeth M. A. Strain; Peter Todd; Mo S. Turner; Catarina Vinagre; Kringpaka Wangkulangkul; Andrew Want; Juan Sempere‐Valverde
Global Ecology and Biogeography · Vol. 35, Issue 2 · 2026

Abstract

Aim We investigated how local‐scale environmental heterogeneity influences biodiversity patterns across broad biogeographic gradients, using intertidal microhabitats as a model system within one of the most environmentally stressful ecosystems on Earth. Location Intertidal habitats at 26 locations (two rocky shore sites per location) across six continents, spanning 98° of latitude (38°S to 60°N). Time Period 2019–2022. Major Taxa Studied Algae, sessile and mobile invertebrates. Methods We compared biodiversity and thermal environments across contrasting microhabitats (rock pools and adjacent emergent rock) along a latitudinal gradient, sampling during environmentally ‘milder’ and ‘harsher’ periods. Biodiversity was quantified using multiple richness metrics (mean, total, unique taxa) and functional diversity. Results Microhabitat differences strongly influenced biodiversity patterns across latitude. Rock pools consistently supported higher taxonomic and functional diversity than emergent rock, irrespective of sampling period, reflecting their ability to buffer thermal extremes, particularly under harsher conditions. Mean species richness exhibited a non‐linear, s‐shaped latitudinal pattern, with lowest values near the equator and higher richness at mid‐latitudes, diverging from classical Latitudinal Diversity Gradient expectations. Biodiversity differences between microhabitats were greatest in temperate regions and diminished at low latitudes, where extreme conditions constrained diversity across habitats. Main Conclusions Local environmental heterogeneity can substantially modify, and in some cases obscure large‐scale biodiversity patterns. By mediating exposure to environmental stress, intertidal microhabitats provide insight into how fine‐scale variability interacts with latitudinal stress gradients to shape biodiversity distributions. Incorporating microhabitat variability into biogeographic frameworks is important for understanding global biodiversity patterns and predicting ecological responses to climate change.

Bibliographic Information

JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2026-02-01
Publication Year2026
Volume35
Issue2
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1466-822X
eISSN1466-8238
DOI10.1111/geb.70208
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1998-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/14668238
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.