NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Public Perceptions of Forest Management in North Central Arizona: The Paradox of Demanding More Involvement but Allowing Limits to Legal Action

David M. Ostergren; Kimberly A. Lowe; Jesse B. Abrams; Elizabeth J. Ruther
Journal of Forestry · Vol. 104, Issue 7 · pp. 375-382 · 2006

Abstract

National-level forest policy is changing in response to social pressure to “improve forest health.” A particularly fierce public debate surrounds the forest health impacts of administrative appeals, lawsuits, public involvement, and federal agency ability to balance managerial efficiency, ecological health, and social expectations. A self-administered mail survey was conducted in 2003 to assess public opinion on litigation and forest restoration in north central Arizonan communities in the ponderosa pine ecosystem. Although results indicate some support for limits to the right to file suit, appeal, and review environmental decisions, an overwhelming number of respondents indicate a strong desire to be more informed and involved in forest management decisions.

Bibliographic Information

JournalJournal of Forestry
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2006-10-01
Publication Year2006
Volume104
Issue7
Pages375-382
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0022-1201
eISSN1938-3746
DOI10.1093/jof/104.7.375

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1902-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/44392
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.